Write this down. They’re going to kill a bunch of us. That is what this exercise is for. They’re testing 14 patients. What’s 40% of 7 billion? And this is the second dose! Apparently there are three. Oh well, We dumbshits will line up like pigs to slaughter.
““PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself.
The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. “
And God help us. They’re hyping the “cases” when the test they’re using was never intended to be used for diagnoses. It doesn’t determine if you’re infected, only that particles that resemble the virus is present.
Then by simply reducing the number of thermal cycles one can increase the positives, increasing the cycles will reduce the cycles.
The inventor of the test argued against using PCR as a diagnostic tool.
I say this over and over… it can easily be verified but people seem content following people they know hate their very existence. It’s like explaining to a small child why they should not touch something hot. When your done, the child touches the hot stove and burns himself.
One would think adults would be easier to convince but not true. If someone has PhD or MD or some other title adults today will go to their grave believing everything they’re told.
John Joseph Sinclair says
Oy Vey Oy Vey, my dear, it’s Shekels, Shekels and more Shekels.
SkyKing337 says
Again, truer words were never spoken! Those Shekels come from JEWPITER!!!
Undecider says
They should be testing the effects on fertility in younger subjects.
Ian Haydon should be charged with a public fraud.
Hoax us, poke us!!!
Write this down. They’re going to kill a bunch of us. That is what this exercise is for. They’re testing 14 patients. What’s 40% of 7 billion? And this is the second dose! Apparently there are three. Oh well, We dumbshits will line up like pigs to slaughter.
““PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself.
The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. “
And God help us. They’re hyping the “cases” when the test they’re using was never intended to be used for diagnoses. It doesn’t determine if you’re infected, only that particles that resemble the virus is present.
Then by simply reducing the number of thermal cycles one can increase the positives, increasing the cycles will reduce the cycles.
The inventor of the test argued against using PCR as a diagnostic tool.
I say this over and over… it can easily be verified but people seem content following people they know hate their very existence. It’s like explaining to a small child why they should not touch something hot. When your done, the child touches the hot stove and burns himself.
One would think adults would be easier to convince but not true. If someone has PhD or MD or some other title adults today will go to their grave believing everything they’re told.
Oy Vey Oy Vey, my dear, it’s Shekels, Shekels and more Shekels.
Again, truer words were never spoken! Those Shekels come from JEWPITER!!!
They should be testing the effects on fertility in younger subjects.