‘We Now See an Obsession With Vaccinating Everyone That Can Only Be Described as Pathological.’

But what if placing greater evolutionary pressures on the virus is not for the greater good?

As autumn has come along, cases and deaths have started to rise again in many places, in part due to the seasonal effect, and in part, likely, due to the arrival of the even more infectious delta variant (which raises the herd immunity threshold even further). In the official narrative, the increase in cases and deaths is blamed on the unvaccinated, who are supposedly driving the development of vaccine resistant variants. It’s true that the unvaccinated are more likely to end up in hospital with covid than the vaccinated – the vaccine does offer protection against covid, after all. But it isn’t true that the unvaccinated are driving vaccine resistance.

It seems that the  doctors and ”experts” who appear on tv and who drive public policy have completely forgotten how evolution works. Let’s take bacteria as an analogy. Bacteria develop resistance to antibiotics when we use antibiotics too generously. Indiscriminate use of antibiotics puts evolutionary pressure on bacteria to develop resistance since that’s the only way they can survive in the antibiotic saturated environment. Yet, now, we are supposed to believe that the opposite is true for viruses – they apparently develop resistance when we underuse vaccines! We’re suddenly supposed to believe that up is down and down is up.

Just like with bacteria and antibiotics, vaccine resistance will develop in a situation where the vaccines are being overused if you vaccinate large numbers of healthy young people who don’t really need to be vaccinated then you put strong evolutionary pressure on the virus to become vaccine resistant. Maybe this could be avoided in an imaginary scenario where you can vaccinate every single person on the planet on the same day, thereby stopping the virus in its tracks. But that’s no realistic. It’s taken six months or more to get to 70% vaccinated in most countries, which has given the virus plenty of time to evolve in response to pressure from the vaccines. If we had stuck with only vaccinating the elderly and other risk groups, then we wouldn’t have put as much evolutionary pressure on the virus to develop resistance to the vaccines, and the vaccines might have been more effective for longer.

After a year of massive fear-mongering by governments and the media, it would have been impossible not to offer the vaccine to everyone who wanted it. Even those not at risk believed they were in danger and demanded the vaccine. There was thus always going to be a massive vaccine uptake. But that wasn’t enough. Because it couldn’t be. The logic created by the “deadly pandemic” narrative demands that every single person alive be vaccinated. That is why there is no recognition of the effects of seasonality or of the fact that prior infection provides a level of protection to new infection that is at least as good as that provided by vaccination.

We now see an obsession with vaccinating everyone that can only be described as pathological. The tone taken towards those people who have so far chosen not to be vaccinated is derogatory and dehumanizing to the extreme. They are portrayed as ”anti-vaxxers”, tin foil hat wearing loons, and irresponsible “granny killers”. No effort is made to listen to their real arguments, such as that the vaccine has not been shown to be less risky than the disease for healthy young people, or that it’s hard to trust data from pharmacetical companies and drug regulators when they’ve repeatedly been caught lying and hiding data in the past, or that the vaccine is still only a year old and there is no long term follow-up data. These very valid arguments are portrayed as ridiculous, outlandish, and dumb, when they are anything but.

Peter Goetzche argued in his book, “Deadly medicines and organized crime”, that no-one should take a new drug that’s been on the market for less than seven years, in light of the fact that it often takes that long for dangers to become known and dangerous drugs to be pulled off the market. In recent months, we’ve learned that the Astra-Zeneca vaccine can cause deadly blood clots in the brain, and we’ve learned that the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines can cause myocarditis. The authorities say that these events are extremely rare, based on the number of events that are reported to the authorities. But this ignores the fact that most adverse events don’t get reported.

In recent weeks, I’ve personally seen multiple cases of myocarditis that occurred days after vaccination. When I’ve suggested to colleagues that we should report them to the authorities as possible vaccine side effects, the response I’ve been met with has been roughly this: “oh, yeah, maybe that’s a good idea… I don’t know how to do that”. I’ve reported the cases I’ve handled personally, but my guess, based on this reaction, is that most other cases have not been reported. Obviously, if you believe that what actually gets reported is an accurate estimate of the reality, then you will grossly underestimate the case rate.

It’s hard to maintain faith in science when it is so wilfully distorted to accord with a political agenda, and when many doctors and scientists so happily go along with what is handed down from on high. [Well it serves the interest of their institution and their place in it, doesn’t it?] I recently learned that an excellent study on the covid vaccines, carried out at a prestigious institution, has spent months trying to get published in a peer-reviewed journal, but has been denied again and again, because its results don’t align with the official dogma. Clearly, the journals are engaging in politically motivated censorship. When this is the case, peer-review becomes a harmful process, whose only purpose is to determine the political acceptability of research, not it’s quality or usefulness. It becomes impossible for the lay person, and even for doctors and scientists, to know what the truth is, because uncomfortable truths remain buried or remain at the pre-print stage, which makes it all too easy to dismiss them – “Oh, that’s just a pre-print, it hasn’t been peer-reviewed”. That is the world we live in.

I will end on a positive note though. The delta variant ravaged through India in a few months in spring, and the population went from 20% to 70% with antibodies. 50% of the population was infected over a two month period. That’s not the positive part, this is: Since then case rates have remained low, even as autumn has arrived. That is in spite of the fact that only around 15% of the population has currently been vaccinated. It would appear that the country has reached the point of herd immunity. And it only took a few months to get there, due to the incredible infectiousness of the delta variant.

The idea that herd immunity can only be reached with vaccines is perhaps the most laughable idea to be heavily promulgated during the pandemic, at least to everyone with even a little knowledge of immunology and history. Eighteen months in to the pandemic, most countries are at or on the cusp of herd immunity, regardless of how effective they have been at vaccinating their populations. There is no need to force the remaining 15-30% of the population to take a vaccine they don’t want. The end of the pandemic is in sight.

Source: Sebastian Rushworth MD

  1. ken says

    The good doctor forgot to mention India is handing out free Ivermectin. Doctors in the West are so frightened of nazified governments and medical boards they won’t even mention the word.

    The end of the pandemic is in sight.” (lol)

    There never was a covid pandemic. There was a PCR test pandemic! Operated at 40+ cycles it would go positive for anything. Even Kiwis and Mangos. I hear Elvis got the covid in his tomb.

    A Ouija board would be a better diagnostic tool than the PCR. (serious!)

    1. Mark says

      Likewise the notion of ‘herd immunity’ for a mutating virus. Is there herd immunity for influenza? I suppose, after a fashion, in the sense that many people can shrug it off without serious illness, but that is because they have had something like it before and their immune system recognizes it, not because they had a flu shot. Nobody has ever suggested that the annual flu shot could result in herd immunity, and doctors uniformly agree that you need a fresh flu shot every year because the flu is always mutating and is slightly different every year.

      Yet various sources – including even this one – continue to hold out the possibility of ‘herd immunity’ to the coronavirus.

      Biden, other ‘world leaders’ and the quack doctors they picked for public health executives are pushing hard to clean up pockets of resistance before December, because at the end of December they have to stop using the PCR as the ‘gold standard’.Then you will see ‘new cases’ dry up, and they want to be able to atttribute that to the world having reached the threshold of herd immunity through the miracle of vaccination.

    2. Rabbitnexus says

      Matey, you like many others on the same shtick are doing the truth a great disservice by your mediocre understanding of the facts.

      Ivermectin, to my understanding is doing the same job as Quinine. Discovered in 2005 these drugs act as IONOPHORES, and they enable the passage of ZINC into the cells, thus eliminating ALL CORONA-VIRUSES in 4 to 6 days. This was established with human trials and peer reviewed reports can be found on major science and medical journals between 2005 and 2018. The problem we have with your half informed post is the same as we had with Trump’s deliberately incomplete message about quinine from the start. By ignoring the actual mechanism, namely ZINC and merely mentioning the carrier, quinine (or Ivermectin) you and he opened the door for Fauci and his criminal set to falsify studies and even kill people. Neither quinine nor ivermection are cures. You are harming the truth by your assertion they are. They are merely vehicles for the cure, ZINC. if you’re lucky enough to have enough in your diet they might work, but unless you take supplements otherwise, you will derive no benefit.

      I am telling you, and all others like you who have insufficient information to be informing anybody to STOP IT! You are to me a major stumbling block for the truth.

    3. Afshin Nejat says

      And is anyone reasonably sure, considering today’s socio-political climate of mass-poisoning intrigues and deceptions, that it is really Ivermectin, pure and untainted? They are talking about mRNA infusions through GMO lettuce. Having created an artificial scarcity of something like Ivermectin (whether it is beneficial for a largely invented pandemic or not) creates the perfect vehicle for getting “who knows what” into people desperate to “get cured” via something going into their bodies. It seems daft to simply go along with any major regulated medical event in this current climate. Everyone is being taken on one hell of a ride, and even when they think they are allowed to get off, that is just another ride. Guaranteed. These wicked shits don’t have changes of heart or method, they just shift technique in order to accomplish the same goal while fooling the gullible. It has never been otherwise.

    4. Steven Rowlandson says

      Ken there are no Nazified governments. Only Jewish ,masonic, communist ,LGBTQ, feminist globalist oligarch crime gangs masquerading as governments. Nazi governments would have had these characters shot long ago for crimes against the white race and Christendom.

    5. Eileen Kuch says

      You’re absolutely right, ken, and I agree 100%. Yes, the good doctor forgot to mention India’s handing out free Ivermectin; and doctors in the West are so scared of nazified governments and medical boards they won’t even mention the word.
      “The end of the pandemic is in sight.”
      There was never a covid pandemic (Covid never existed). However, there was a PCR test pandemic! Operated at 40+ cycles it would go positive for anything, even Kiwis and Mangos. I, too, hear Elvis got the covid in his tomb:D
      I agree, a Ouija board would be a better diagnostic tool than the PCR. (serious)

    6. david i carter says

      Yes,the board would be far superior

    7. Thomas Turk says

      Same here in Siam.. not a whisper of IverM, Vit.D3, Chloroquine nor zinc, while the country bleeds. Med. Auth. gone INSANE! My IvermM dose was 20X the price and the last one the chemist had.

  2. Mark Vedder says

    You present us with some facts, and lament that “science … is so wilfully distorted to accord with a political agenda” which is a fair observation. But when was the last time you saw a political force voluntarily relinquish newly acquired power? Facts and science are as moot as the populace’s easily swayed mood.

    Just as we can force a virus to mutate, think of how the successful propagandization and the newly acquired governmental controls will have to mutate to stay alive if we start giving credence to facts. It’s a dangerous, slippery slope.

    Humble, slavish adherence to the puppeteered mob mind is our safest bet. I was encouraged to see the last half of your first paragraph securely cajoling the status quo. Democracy proper is mob rule, and today democracy has come in to its own.

    1. Drapetomaniac says

      Man has domesticated numerous animals. Man’s world would be at a great loss without them.

      Government has domesticated man. Man’s world would benefit greatly without government.

      Government in the 20th century equals about 400 million deaths, about $100 trillion stolen, and about another $100 trillion of wealth destroyed.

  3. Drapetomaniac says

    Everything government touches turns to crap.

    Ringo Starr

  4. Natasha says

    There is no test for the delta variant. It is all a hoax. The point of the covid is the vaccine.

  5. Rabbitnexus says

    This is garbage. Mostly it is just reinforcing the COVID lies.

  6. GMC says

    I remember when the media called it the Winter Cold season. I took my Sputnik Lite jab today – It was the fastest shot I ever had – the little syringe had about 1/2 inch of vaccine in it and within 2 to 3 seconds – done. So, I’m officially a Herd immunity kind of guy with a Sputnik lite splash. And this is my 3rd flu shot I’ve ever had – but I don’t trust those Bioweapons labs that seem to be – everywhere.

  7. Bobby says

    It cannot be described in any other way but pathological. What’s behind it. Certainly not science. And Fauci? When will he be dragged in front of Congress and questioned until he’s well grilled? He knows when , where, how and why about this virus and Dr Rand Paul nailed him—twice. The rest of the Congress with few exceptions, are morons.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.