Vaccine Effectiveness Drops Sharply Even for Severe Disease, Goes Into NEGATIVE for Some Groups — New Lancet Study From Sweden

"With a number of subgroups even showing negative efficacy against severe outcomes"

Editor’s summary: Effectivness against infection drops to zero after just 120 days for AZ. Overall effectiveness against severe outcome drops down to 20% at eights months, but for some groups at that time it is already negative. (More severe Covid outcomes among the vaccinated.)

The study (a Lancet pre-print) finds that Pfizer vaccine effectiveness wanes from 92% at day 15-30 to 47% at day 121-180, and from day 211 (seven months) and onwards “no effectiveness could be detected”. For AstraZeneca, vaccine effectiveness “was generally lower and waned faster, with no effectiveness detected from day 121 [four months] and onwards”. (The figure they found was actually negative, minus-19%.)

While effectiveness against severe outcomes held up for many groups over nine months, it was found to wane significantly among men, older frail people, and people with comorbidities, contributing to an overall fall from 89% at day 15-30 to 42% from day 181 (six months) and onwards, with a number of subgroups even showing negative efficacy against severe outcomes.

The graphs included in the paper are reproduced below. Note the negative effectiveness against infection at nine months (top chart) and the effectiveness against severe outcomes down to around 20% at eight months (bottom chart).

The confirmation here of vaccine effectiveness against infection declining to zero will not come as a surprise to readers of the Daily Sceptic, though it may baffle readers of the New Scientist and others living in the parallel reality of highly effective vaccines. The sharp waning against severe disease is more of a surprise given recent data from PHE/UKHSA, and is worth watching closely.

Source: The Daily Sceptic

  1. Mark says

    Yes, but note the conclusion; “this strengthens the rationale for a third booster dose”. My, that’ll disappoint Big Pharma, won’t it? The miracle vaccines don’t stay ‘safe and effective’ for long, but cheer up! As long as you get a shot every six months or so, you antibodies will be all revved up. Moo!!! That’s the cash cow calling.

    1. James says

      I personally don’t think the ‘vaccines’ are designed to be a cash cow. Otherwise, they would have created harmless injections. Those death shots are designed to poison. They are designed to kill. The cash is just icing on the cake.

      1. Kieran says

        could be the graphene oxide in the two shots is being degraded by the recipients body and/or not doing its job hence the need for a booster

  2. Victor says

    Negative efficacy means only one thing – the vaccine is damaging your immune system’s ability to fight off disease.

    Boosters will only worsen the damage. Don’t take them!

  3. guest says

    The article and the “editor’s summary” starts from the false premise that there was something here in 2020, against which a vaccine was needed. (until December 15, 2020, an O’Henry bar was just as effective against this non-existent epidemic as anything pFizer could invent)

    The article completely leaves out that it was the “vaccine” that induced the bodies of the recepients to produce Delta-version; and induced them to “shed” Delta as if they were spray-cans.

    Antibody-dependent Enhancement (ADE) and Vaccines

    Antibody-Dependent Enhancement, ADE

    the National Institute of Health on these virus enhancing vaccines:

  4. Voz 0db says

    “waning vaccine effectiveness” is a built-in feature. This allows BIG PHARMA to keep making huge PROFITS and culling more old and obsolete and undesired uman animals…

    Carry on!

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.