Vaccinated English Are Up to 86% MORE Susceptible to Infection and It Keeps Getting Worse — Public Health England Data

A vaccine with negative effectiveness vs infection in everyone over 30 (and going deeper into negative every month)

Related: Public Health England Data: Vaccinated Over 40s Are Experiencing Higher Covid Rates Than the Uninjected


The latest Public Health England (PHE) Vaccine Surveillance report was released on Thursday, meaning we can update our estimates of unadjusted vaccine effectiveness from real-world data.

As before, the report itself states this is “not the most appropriate method” to assess vaccine effectiveness as it is not adjusted for various confounders (and they do not provide the data that would allow such adjustments to be made). ‘Fact-checking’ website Full Fact (funded by Big Tech) are currently trying to censor the Daily Sceptic because, they claim, this means it is ‘incorrect’ to use the data in the report to calculate vaccine effectiveness. This is not true, however: regardless of what PHE deems to be the “most appropriate method”, vaccine effectiveness is defined as the reduction in the proportion of infections in the vaccinated group compared to the unvaccinated group, and it is perfectly acceptable to estimate it from population data, as long as any limitations in the data are acknowledged. [That’s literally how the vaccine makers and the Vaccine Taliban calculate effectiveness but suddenly the same calculation is “incorrect” when the result goes against them.]

It is certainly not ‘incorrect’ to use the latest population-based data to get an up-to-date estimate of unadjusted vaccine effectiveness as part of tracking how the vaccines are performing on the ground.

Perhaps the most important limitations in this data are that the high risk were originally prioritised for vaccination and that those who have been previously infected may be more likely to decline vaccination. Both of these would artificially lower the vaccine effectiveness. However, a recent population study in the Lancet adjusted its vaccine effectiveness estimates to take account of no fewer than 22 different confounding factors, including these, and in almost all cases this resulted in very little change. [Which is expected because we are looking only at the recent most weeks, not the whole of 2020.] For instance, here are the adjusted and unadjusted estimates against infection by age. (Note that the high values here are for the whole study period; what the study showed overall is that in more recent months vaccine effectiveness has been dropping fast.)

Two stay the same, two change by one point, one changes by two points and one changes by three points. This is typical of the vaccine effectiveness estimates in the study, with very few exceptions. This suggests that the unadjusted estimates from large population studies like this are already very close to the mark in most cases, with any adjustments being small. This gives us reason for confidence that the unadjusted estimates from the PHE data, even if, according to them, not “the most appropriate method”, will be sufficiently close to be useful.

So here, without further ado, is the table with the latest vaccine effectiveness estimates, for the period September 6th to October 3rd. (For the previous three tables see my previous post.)

Note that unvaccinated here means actually unvaccinated, not partially vaccinated or post-jab. Hospitalisation means “cases presenting to emergency care (within 28 days of a positive specimen) resulting in an overnight inpatient admission”.

Strikingly, the (unadjusted) vaccine effectiveness (VE) in over-18s continues to drop. For those in their 40s it hits nearly minus-86% this week, down from minus-66% in last week’s report.

This means the double-vaccinated in their 40s are now getting on for being almost twice as likely to be infected as the unvaccinated of the same age.

Those in their 50s, 60s and 70s have similarly super-low VE estimates, while the unadjusted VE for those in their 30s goes negative for the first time, having been dropping for some weeks. For the under-18s, on the other hand – which is the group currently being vaccinated – it actually went up, from 84% to 88%.

Public health officials should be making a priority of investigating the reasons for this alarming inversion of vaccine effect in the over-30s.

The fact that instead we have an effort from Government-approved ‘fact-checkers’ to suppress the reporting of it is disturbing, to say the least.

Vaccine effectiveness against serious disease and death continues to hold up well, save in the over-80s, where VE against hospitalisation has dropped from 59% to 51% since last week’s report, which is worrying as most of the deaths are in the over-80s. Effectiveness against death in the over-80s has been sliding more gradually from 70% in weeks 32-35 down to 64% in weeks 36-39, a month later.

Oddly, the text of the report contains an error. It states: “The rate of a positive COVID-19 test is substantially lower in vaccinated individuals compared to unvaccinated individuals up to the age of 39.” This is the same statement (word-for-word) the surveillance reports have made since they started reporting this data in week 36. However, it clearly is no longer true for those in their 30s, where the infection rate in the vaccinated is now slightly higher than in the unvaccinated, and needs updating.

A new PHE Technical Briefing has also been published recently, but we cannot update our VE estimates from that data as we usually do as they have decided to discontinue including it. A note explained:

Cases, hospitalisation, attendance and deaths by vaccination status are now presented in the COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report and therefore this data will not be produced in future editions of the variant technical briefing. These tables will be reinstated in the technical briefing if new variants of concern arise.

This is a pity as the Technical Briefing data, while limited to sequenced Delta positive tests, was useful because it went back to February and was published with a fortnight added at a time, allowing data for each two-week period to be analysed. The Vaccine Surveillance report data, on the other hand, only appears in four-week chunks a week at a time, preventing finer analysis, and only goes back to August.

What is really needed, of course, is for the full anonymised data to be released so that it can be analysed independently of Government and its favoured scientists. This is what those in Government and Parliament who care about transparency and truth should be pushing hard for, as without such full transparency the scope for real accountability is limited.

In the meantime, this real-world data from PHE, with infection rates in the double-vaccinated hugely outpacing those in the unvaccinated across many age groups, continues to make a mockery of the vaccine passports and mandates that have become oddly popular even as the data mounts-up that they are pointless.

Source: The Daily Sceptic


Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Tzvi
Tzvi
6 days ago

960+ PAGES mostly negative comments to the Anti-Torah Israeli Government lies about Covid-19 Injections ( mostly Pfizer):

https://rivkalevy.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Israel-Ministry-of-Health-Lets-talk-about-the-side-effects.pdf

Everyone commenting seems to know multiple bad reactions, if not talking about themselves….

This is why we need a Torah Kingdom ( Beit Dawid) in Israel, and the Al-Aqsa / Haram Es Sharif can stay as they are not on the Temple site ( period).

ken
ken
6 days ago

Notice all articles like this never mention the poor bastards that died. Or those now writhing in pain from some exotic disease, the cancers, heart attacks, strokes brought on by the safe and effective clotshot.

Then in the hospital they give you remdesivir,,, another EUA fraudci drug that never completed studies,,, that attacks your kidneys (and other organs) and causes your lungs to fill up.

With lungs congested the air forced in by the ventilator has no where to go and pop goes your lungs!

What a great way to go! Hospital wheels you to the cooler,,, collects $50,000 dollars and a get out of jail free card. You’re marked up as another covid victim to push up the numbers scaring the lemmings to take the clotshot ‘boosters’.

Ssssshh. No one is supposed to talk about all this… hush hush you know.

guest
guest
6 days ago
Reply to  ken

Actually NIH knows full well how bad Remdesivir is, they tested it.
NIH also knows how good Ivermectin is; they tested it, too.

Please visit these two links:
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/tables/table-2e/
https://www.cms.gov/medicare/covid-19/new-covid-19-treatments-add-payment-nctap

pod
pod
5 days ago

If, as you say, the death rates are being reduced by the ‘vaccines’ this is their defence for using it, whatever the case rate.

Last edited 5 days ago by pod
U.S. Champ
U.S. Champ
5 days ago
Reply to  pod

if you kill enough people off fast enough with the shot then yeah…i guess the official Death rate is reduced but only because the population is now smaller!

Daz
Daz
5 days ago

People I know have been injected all seem to have the sniffles now. I guess their magic masks can’t protect them from the spike proteins!

stephen kastl
stephen kastl
4 days ago

I fear that mass deaths due to the mRNA vaccine are coming up this year and the next. How do the mRNA manufacturers think they can get away with mass murder and wilful negligence? They will either be in jail for the rest of their lives or mobs of the vaccinated will hang them when the vaccinated realize they are doomed to disability followed by death.

Ultrafart the Brave
Ultrafart the Brave
2 days ago
Reply to  stephen kastl

“I fear that mass deaths due to the mRNA vaccine are coming up this year and the next. How do the mRNA manufacturers think they can get away with mass murder and wilful negligence?”

Easy – according to this whistle-blower, Mr. Kieran Morrissey, the WHO is planning to declare a new global “pandemic” in the coming months – this time it’s going to be the Ebola-style hemorrhagic Marburg virus…

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vzjFV807OvHF/

Mr. Morrissey makes the following claims…

  • Bill Gates has already published papers “warning” that the next “pandemic” will be the deadly Marburg virus.
  • The Corona Chan “booster shots” will be used to produce the hemorrhagic symptoms to kick off the Marburg “pandemic” hysteria.
  • The WHO already has the fake PCR tests and fake “vaccines” for the Marburg “pandemic” ready to go.
  • The Marburg “vaccines” have been laced with Ricin – one of the deadliest known toxins.

So how are any of the Corona Chan criminals going to be held to account when we’re all running scared under martial law in the midst of the deadly global Marburg “pandemic”?

Bobby
Bobby
3 days ago

The British USED to be smart.

Anti-Empire