Ukraine’s Army Is Underfunded, Outgunned and Not on the Same Planet as Russia’s

Ukraine spends $900 million on procurement. Russia spends $24 billion

“Much stronger than in 2014” is a very relative term

Ukraine’s military is much stronger and better prepared than 2014, when it couldn’t resist Russia’s annexation of Crimea. [Half of the Ukrainian officers stationed in Crimea accepted to enter into the Russian military.] But a lack of weapons from the West and underspending at home has left its troops without even the deep stocks of basic supplies they’d need in a high intensity conflict.

Instead, as fears rise in the U.S. and Europe of a potential invasion by President Vladimir Putin, Ukraine finds its army dwarfed by Russia’s forces and its spending power. The Russian president has sustained his latest troop buildup on the border, saying the North Atlantic Treaty Organization must reduce its presence in the region.

In the event of a war, only a massive influx of sophisticated weaponry from Kyiv’s Western backers could ensure its defense. [No, it couldn’t.] So far its requests for big ticket items like air and missile defense systems have gone unanswered despite assurances that “NATO stands with Ukraine.”

The U.S. has put together a fresh package including Javelin anti-tank missiles, small arms, medical kits and body armor, sticking to defensive weapons and support for Ukraine’s cyber capabilities in a bid to help Kyiv without giving Putin an excuse for action, people familiar with the discussions said, adding that President Joe Biden has signed off on the plan. National Security Council spokespeople didn’t immediately comment.

Volodymyr Zelenskiy, Ukraine’s president, centre, inspects sniper rifles during an Interior Ministry military drill in Stare, Ukraine, on Monday, Sept. 30, 2019. Fallout from Donald Trump’s phone call with Ukraine’s leader is reverberating far beyond Washington. Photographer: Evgeniy Maloletka/Bloomberg

At home, meantime, money is short. Some funds collected from taxpayers for defense are spent elsewhere, while waste and corruption still take a toll after years of attempted reform.

Kyiv’s budget for defense procurement was 23 billion hryvnia ($838 million) for 2021, rising to 28 billion hryvnia for 2022. That’s a big increase from 2014 but still a rounding error in terms of what the Kremlin has outlaid.

Russia spends about 40% of its $60 billion-plus defense budget on procurement, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, twice as much in absolute terms as France, Germany or the U.K., let alone Ukraine.

All wage earners in Ukraine have to pay a special levy, sold as a way to boost defense spending. In 2021 that raised 28.6 billion hryvnia, enough in theory to double arms procurement. Yet the money goes into the general tax fund. A Finance Ministry spokesperson said it was “impossible’” to know whether it was spent on defense, health or other priorities.

When the Defense Ministry came to parliament in December with its shopping list for 2022, news of the Russian troop build-up had long since broken. But the number of bulletproof vests it wanted to buy was just half the amount needed for current troop numbers, let alone the reserves that would be called up should a Russian invasion materialize, according to Serhiy Rakhmanin, an opposition lawmaker and member of the parliamentary committee on National Security, Defense and Intelligence.

Due to a lack of funds, there weren’t enough rifles or helmets on the list either, said Rakhmanin, a former journalist who has been critical as a lawmaker of President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and his government. There was however a request for remarkably pricey waffle towels and Soviet-era radiation detection equipment that’s no longer of obvious utility.

“I had a question: OK, let’s say war starts tomorrow, do you really need this stuff?” Rakhmanin said. The towels and detectors were removed from the list.

The Defense Ministry has pledged to upgrade its procedures, blaming delays in procurement on bureaucracy and promising to reduce classified contracts in order to reduce corruption. Multiple requests for a response to Rakhmanin’s claims did not elicit a comment.

The National Security and Defense Council also said in late December the government will set up an interagency working group to verify the supply of weapons and food to the military over the 2017-2021 period.

The military has nonetheless made strides over the last seven or so years. In 2014 it could put just a fraction of a nominal force of 120,000 troops into combat, with battle tanks mothballed, major air defenses inoperable and just four MiG-29 jets out of a fleet of 46 fit to fly, according to Mykola Bielieskov, a defense analyst at the National Institute for Strategic Studies, a think tank attached to the Ukrainian presidency.

Today, Ukraine is capable of deploying the majority of its 205,000 active troops, together with working, if often vintage, equipment, says Bielieskov. Its Soviet-legacy arms industry has developed new missiles, surveillance drones and radar-guided anti-artillery capabilities.

The problem is the government hasn’t bought enough of even its own new weapons to take on Russia.

“Is Ukraine ready to fight? Yes and no, because Ukraine didn’t start this war,” Hanna Shelest, the Odessa-based editor of Ukraine Analytica, said last month during a U.S. Council on Foreign Relations webcast. She was referring to the conflict with Russian-armed separatists that Ukraine’s military has been fighting in the eastern Donbas region since the annexation of Crimea.

At the same time, Shelest said, the nation’s institutions, military and people are now much better prepared in case Putin decides to escalate. [Funny because up until now it was Kiev which was talking escalation — against the rebel republics in the east.]

It remains unclear what Putin’s intentions are, as he simultaneously pursues diplomatic negotiations with Biden and a military buildup. He has repeatedly denied he currently plans to invade.

Russia’s large deployment is expensive and difficult to maintain for long. At the same time Putin’s list of diplomatic demands is so expansive they could take months if not years to negotiate, according to Michael Kofman, research program director at CNA, a Virginia-based think tank.

“It is clear by now that the Russians don’t think they will suffer devastating casualties,” he said.

In any operation, Russia could first use its technological advantages to disable the Ukrainian military from afar, obliterating its air force, runways, air defenses, munitions dumps and command and control systems in a barrage for which Ukraine would have little or no response, according to Kofman and others.

Ukrainian troops might have little chance to make use of their vaunted U.S. Javelin anti-tank weapons and armed drones recently acquired from NATO member Turkey, before a punitive settlement was imposed.

“Ukrainians know how to fight, but they do not have the equipment, especially for deep operations,” said Bielieskov. “The Russians have Iskander (ballistic) missiles, electronic warfare, latest generation aircraft and all these things.”

Visiting Washington in November, Defense Minister Oleksiy Reznikov said he’d asked for the high-end equipment Ukraine would need to start redressing the imbalance. Yet U.S. missile and air-defense systems would be difficult to quickly transport and integrate for use in Ukraine, even if a political decision was taken for America to become so deeply involved in a potential conflict with Russia.

The U.S. says it has delivered $2.5 billion in military aid to Ukraine since 2014, but that was designed to contain militants in eastern Ukraine, rather than a full Russian invasion.

Other NATO countries have also provided aid and training, but Zelenskiy has accused Germany of blocking the alliance as a whole from providing more arms. Germany and the Netherlands say so long as there is a threat of conflict with Russia, NATO should not give Ukraine lethal weapons, Deputy Prime Minister for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration Olha Stefanishyna told Interfax-Ukraine Tuesday.

Estonia plans to provide howitzers and Javelin missiles, primarily for anti-tank defense, the ERR news service reported last week. To do so it would need permission from the U.S., Germany and Finland, where the equipment originated. The Biden administration is in favor of the idea in principle, according to one person familiar with the administration’s thinking.

Additional shoulder-fired anti-aircraft weapons would be a more pragmatic ask than Patriot batteries, according to Bielieskov. These require little training and would allow troops to counter Russian helicopter gunships and force its attack jets to fly at higher altitudes, reducing their effectiveness and helping Ukrainian forces survive bombardments.

But for Glen Grant, a retired British artillery officer and ex-adviser to Ukraine’s parliament on military reform, officials need to focus on basic supplies — building the missing reserves of food, ammunition and light transport.

“Numbers don’t count for much, it is the ability to put the troops in the right place with the right equipment and the right moment that’s vital,” said Grant, now senior expert at Latvia’s Baltic Security Foundation. “The burn rate in a major war is huge, it will dwarf anything that happened in 2014.”

Source: Bloomberg

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

ken
ken
17 days ago

I give Ukraine a couple of weeks on it own,,, less if it gets US/Nato assistance. Nato has never fought a war and the US seems pretty good at losing wars. The West are no longer ahead technology wise and most of the production is in China. The West have dumbed down their societies to a point where it will take decades to bring them up to manufacturing speed.

Also, It’s a logistical nightmare for the war mongering West. All Russia would really have to do is take out incoming rail, ports/highways and control the airspace.

Another factor (a big one) is determination. The West only wants to ravage Russia and it’s resources. Russia on the other hand will be fighting for survival but,,, they all want a seat at the great reset table. The bigger you are the more say you have and you will get a bigger slice of the booty. This is the ultimate reason.

Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln
17 days ago
Reply to  ken

I give Ukraine a couple of weeks with US/Nato assistance. Without 48 hours tops. The corrupt Zio Nazi Ukraine government is hated by over 90% of the population and they will be glad to overthrow it. The problem for Russia had been they will need Chinese investment to help rebuild Ukraine from decades of Zio looting Now it looks like they have such approval from China.

Jerry Hood
Jerry Hood
16 days ago

You said it right!

Eddy
Eddy
16 days ago

At the risk of BORING regular readers on this site, I must REPEAT what I’ve been saying from day one.
That is, Russia has repeated adnauseum, hundreds of times now, they are NOT prepared to take on the economic burden of Ukraine.
Why is this FACT, taking so long to sink in to some heads ? Why is it Russia’s responsibility to “rebuild Ukraine” at their expense ?? Ukraine is an INDEPENDENT nation, and the ONUS is on themselves, to rebuild what THEY have destroyed. Kinda like putting THEIR money where THEIR mouths are. Let’s see how they manage that. Destroying things is easy, now lets see them rebuild. When are the Western nations going to be held accountable for rebuilding the nations that THEY have destroyed ? Why are THEY being given a free pass in this regard, but Russia, who has not destroyed anyone, is continually expected to right the mess Western nations have wrought ???????????

Eddy
Eddy
16 days ago
Reply to  ken

Ken, you are a very generous person. IF there were conflict to break out between Ukraine and Russia, I give Ukraine three to four days, before they raise the white flag. They simply do not have the capacity to take on Russia, one on one, and THEY KNOW IT. That’s the whole reason they keep spouting this narrative of Russian invasion. Consider, they have been spouting this bullshit from day one, you’d think people would remember that ? Their whole idea is to get the Western nations to accept their concocted story, and come do their fighting for them. Simple as that. That’s why they’re trying so hard to join NATO, but the rules forbid them from joining, until their disagreement with Donbass is resolved. The main reason the Ukies are spitting chips, is because the Russians have out manouvered them with the transit of gas. That has provided Ukraine with very lucrative income, now threatened to being cut off.
They have no one to blame, but themselves, IMHO, for ripping off the Russians for many years, AND the Europeans as well. I also suspect one of the reasons there’s not too much support coming from the Europeans is for this very reason. The Ukies have backed themselves into a corner, trying to manipulate everyone around them to suit their purposes, but it’s backfired tragicly for them. Tough Titties.

julian
julian
17 days ago

Let’s not forget the hapless Ukrainian conscripts. I bet most of them don’t want to be there and certainly don’t want to throw their lives away for Kiev. Even the Neo nazis had second thoughts after the previous crushing defeat.

Eddy
Eddy
16 days ago
Reply to  julian

IMHO, IF the situation ever arises, that there IS conflict between Ukraine and Russia, my money is on the Conscripts laying down their arms and surrendering enmasse to the Russians.

Jerry Hood
Jerry Hood
16 days ago

Zionazi jews censoring you here….

PtownP
PtownP
16 days ago

Western arms for the Kiev regime? Why, the more the better! They will be captured by the Russian Army and used to reequip the DPR/LPR defenses after the Kiev regimes army collapses faster than the western equipped Afghanistan National Army fell to Taliban rebels. And woe be unto any American, UK or NATO country mercenaries or military advisors left stranded in Ukraine ala Afghanistan. They will be rounded up by Russians and the governments of those nationals will have pay a very steep price for the release of their mercenaries.   

GMC
GMC
16 days ago

Ukie armies are just part of the picture. The US has been building more BioWeapons around Russia than Nato has armies. And Kazakhstan should open Russian eyes up or else. Say what ? Ukraine – 12+ BioWeapons Labs – Georgia – 1 huge one and probably some Satellites – Kazakhstan – 6 maybe 7 BioWeapons Labs.
Ya, that ” Old Man” that ran/runs Kazakh and his family are billionaires many times over and he let in the NWO, US military and the big Pharma BioWeapons labs, using the gaz, oil and uranium to his own advantage also.
Notice that that X Ukie Prez YanukoBitch also let in the NWO Globalists and their BioLabs, being disguised as Agriculture and Animal labs.. Since then Poroshankster and the other comedian prez also lets the NWO and US , do whatever they want – also.

Which brings up the Big Question Why is Russia allowing this shit to happen , but plays with Nato on its Borders ? My sources ? Vladimir Platov’s many articles @ NEO, Dilyana Gaytandzhieva from Bulgaria and Anti Empire +Edward Slav…. with his correlations of big pharma and Russia.And like the rest of you – I connect the Dots.

Anti-Empire