Tulsi Crushes the First Democrat Debate, The Most Googled Candidate, Landslide Winner in a Bunch of Polls

The fool who dared go against her was scorched, isn't even on the radar

Barely got any time to speak still managed to introduce herself to America

Tim Ryan sets up Tulsi Gabbard for her “Giuliani moment”:

The result; the entire America wants to know who this maverick woman is:

• FOX: Gabbard was most searched Democratic candidate after debate despite getting third-lowest speaking time

Reason: Tulsi Gabbard Wrecks Dems With Powerful Anti-War Debate Answers

• NBC-picked studio crowd goes silent as Gabbard promises to cut Pentagon overspending rather than hike taxes:

“The American people deserve a president who will put your interests ahead of the rich and powerful. That’s not what we have right now,” Gabbard said.

“For too long, our leaders have failed us, taking us from one regime change war to the next, leading us into a new cold war and arms race, costing us trillions of our hard-earned taxpayer dollars and countless lives. This insanity must end. As president, I will take your hard-earned taxpayer dollars and instead invest those dollars into serving your needs,” she continued.

The Daily Caller:

In a Drudge Report [conservative] online poll, Gabbard has 41.63% with 31,114 votes. Her closest rival, Elizabeth Warren, has 11.94% with 8,925 votes. So far, 74,736 votes were surveyed for Drudge’s poll.

Other online surveys from the Washington Examiner, NJ.com and Heavy all point towards similar results with Gabbard winning almost every early online poll. Each poll shows her averaging between 30% – 40% of the total vote.

Washington Examiner has her coming on top with 39.22% of the vote, NJ.com shows Gabbard with 34.67% and the Heavy has her at 32.24%.

It’s important to note that these polls are hardly scientific and may not be representative of everyone who watched the debate.

Drudge poll:

Washington Examiner:

Heavy.com:

NJ.com:

7 Comments
  1. Natural_Texan says

    Clearly she is the best candidate an she clearly knows what’s most important and is willing to talk about it.. Go Tulsi!

    As a measure of her appeal and effectiveness she is being slammed especially by the right wing pundits and blogs, not her stance on wars and waste and rebuilding America.. but for simply being a Democrat and standing on a stage next to that gang of losers!

  2. MyWikiDisQus says

    Here is one scenario that can happen (in my opinion).

    Congresswoman Gabbard is charming, young and attractive. She is well spoken and doesn’t appear to be easily upset when attacked by so called, “news commentators” such as the fusillade of questions about her Syria trip during the interview on the
    MSNBC television show, Morning Joe. Advance the video stream to the 2:40 mark here: https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/rep-gabbard-assad-is-not-an-enemy-of-the-us-1438093891865

    Her website TulsiGabbard.org lists the issues she feels are most important for the American people. The leadership of the Democratic Party will watch her progress carefully, measuring all the sampling polls as to how the democratic base responds to her campaign as it proceeds up to the primary party election.

    If she is at least tied for the party nomination, the powerbrokers will “guarantee” Gabbard the delegate votes she needs to win if, she agrees to accept Hillary Clinton as her running mate. That’s right, the Clinton dynasty is poised to rise again.

    Gabbard has a tough choice; she despises Clinton but the thought of holding the title of, “Leader of the free world” is worth it and accepts the conditions placed upon her. At that point her fate is sealed as the political machine is engaged to maximum nationwide attention. It’s Trump the incumbent, Mr. “Crude and Rude” verses the darling, soft-spoken but firmly resolved woman challenger. If it was scripted by Hollywood (and it will be, no doubt) it couldn’t be written any better.

    Trump will attack Gabbard as being an inexperienced, fledgling, newcomer to high-drama politics. She is not intimidated at all and plays the part of lead champion for the military men and women who have been denied proper, post-combat long term care by Trump’s Veterans Administration. She doesn’t let up and talks up all the foreign wars that did not bring democracy and freedom to the suffering masses but instead, chaos and economic ruin. Then there is the huge financial cost of all the waste that warfare contractors have benefited from, e.g., F-35 Lightening II multipurpose fighter, the Navy’s littoral ship disaster, burn pits, etc.

    Trump is no pushover given all he has faced with Russia-gate, his personal dalliances before his presidency, his hiring and firing of key cabinet positions, etc. He is a fighter; this second-term campaign exhilarates him primarily because it will feed his megalomaniac personality. Gabbard has to use all her feminine skills without the tears and vocal inflection that could suggest weakness to her male opponent.

    The outcome?

    If Trump wins in 2020, the globalists continue to weave their evil against lesser nations.

    If Gabbard wins the presidency, it would be huge, monumental and unprecedented not only because she would be the first woman elected president but a sitting member of the House of Representatives which has not happened since James Garfield in 1881.

    Politics in America is like stage magic; a three-act structure referred to in the business as the pledge, the turn and the prestige. The “pledge” is offering the electorate a candidate who is an ordinary woman. The “turn” is the candidate who miraculously ascends to high office. The “prestige” is the trick that fools the electorate into believing their will has been served.

    The clever ruse designed by the Democrats is to switch Tulsi Gabbard for criminal Hillary Clinton. Her backup would be the person second in line to the U.S. presidency, that being the Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat too.

    You ask, “How could Hillary Clinton become president if Tulsi Gabbard was elected?” I’ll answer that question by reminding everyone that James Garfield held office for only a few months as the Chief Executive before he was assassinated.

    “Double, double toil and trouble;
    Fire burn and caldron bubble.
    Cool it with a baboon’s blood,
    Then the charm is firm and good.”

    (From Macbeth by William Shakespeare)

  3. CHUCKMAN says

    I don’t watch television, so I didn’t see the debate.

    But I know Tulsi Gabbard can be impressive.

    That, of course, is precisely why she gets so little mainstream press coverage or mention by other politicians.

    Indeed, she is treated as something of a pariah by many, as other past genuine independent American voices have been, from Ralph Nader to Ron Paul.

    She is the only candidate saying at least some of the truths going to the heart of America’s serious problems.

    Since her truths touch on empire and the use of force to keep it going, hers is not a welcome voice.

    The costly, violent commitments America insists upon abroad terribly affect matters back home, too. American society suffers from many ugly and damaging problems because imperial/military efforts literally chew up resources and rivet the attention of politicians. It’s a serious systematic social disease, if you will.

    Virtually all politicians in both parties embrace the empire and the military as part of the natural environment of the country.

    Kind of a geopolitical natural environment, not to be messed with or fouled.

    After all, they all profit from it, either in career paths and benefits or in money.

    The graphs of public response to Tulsi’s words, words the debate format kept extremely limited, strikingly demonstrate that large numbers do respond when they get to hear her.

    It is, of course, just part of the way America is ruled that all genuine maverick political voices are quietly and effectively muffled. It is treatment the exact opposite of that extended to a John McCain kind of maverick, someone who actually shilled full-time for empire and establishment while pretending to be independent. McCain served as a domestic version of the mercenaries the United States employs in places like Syria, mercenaries disguised as jihadi types.

    Unfortunately, the polling results may provide a spur to even greater efforts at keeping her isolated.

    That’s just how it is in America’s great “democracy,” which produces leadership like Trump, Bolton, Pompeo, and Haspel and forges unbreakable bonds of friendship with the bloody likes of the Saudi Crown Prince and Netanyahu.

    Readers may enjoy:
    https://chuckmanwordsincomments.wordpress.com/2018/07/22/john-chuckman-comment-how-american-politics-really-work-why-there-are-terrible-candidates-and-constant-wars-and-peoples-problems-are-ignored-why-heroes-like-julian-assange-are-persecuted-and-r/

    https://chuckmanwordsincomments.wordpress.com/2019/02/09/john-chuckman-comment-honest-tulsi-gabbard-and-americas-vicious-establishment-press-for-the-role-of-2020-woman-outsider-candidate-they-have-kamala-harris-obama-redux-a-pleasantly-smiling-say/

    https://chuckmanwordsincomments.wordpress.com/2019/02/15/john-chuckman-comment-tulsi-gabbard-is-the-most-appealing-american-politician-in-a-long-time-the-realities-awaiting-her-should-she-ever-manage-to-get-elected-elizabeth-warren-and-p-t-barnum/

    1. Natural_Texan says

      Thanks for including the international criminal Haspel in your list of loathsome figures. She has slipped so seamlessly into her role as head spy that any hint of controversy over her or her appointment has vanished.

  4. MyWikiDisQus says

    Here is one scenario that can happen (in my opinion).

    Gabbard is charming, young and attractive. She is well spoken and doesn’t appear to be easily upset when attacked by so called, “news commentators” such as the fusillade of questions about her Syria trip during the interview on the MSNBC television show, Morning Joe. Advance the video stream to the 2:40 mark here: https://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/watch/rep-gabbard-assad-is-not-an-enemy-of-the-us-1438093891865

    Her website TulsiGabbard.org lists the issues she feels are most important for the American people. The leadership of the Democratic Party will watch her progress carefully, measuring all the sampling polls as to how the democratic base responds to her campaign as it proceeds up to the primary party election.

    If she is at least tied for the party nomination, the powerbrokers will “guarantee” Gabbard the delegate votes she needs to win if, she agrees to accept Hillary Clinton as her running mate. That’s right, the Clinton dynasty is poised to rise again.

    Gabbard has a tough choice; she despises Clinton but the thought of holding the title of, “Leader of the free world” is worth it and accepts the conditions placed upon her. At that point her fate is sealed as the political machine is engaged to maximum nationwide attention. It’s Trump the incumbent, Mr. “Crude and Rude” verses the darling, soft-spoken but firmly resolved woman challenger. If it was scripted by Hollywood (and it will be, no doubt) it couldn’t be written any better.

    Trump will attack Gabbard as being an inexperienced, fledgling, newcomer to high-drama politics. She is not intimidated at all and plays the part of lead champion for the military men and women who have been denied proper, post-combat long term care by Trump’s Veterans Administration. She doesn’t let up and talks up all the foreign wars that did not bring democracy and freedom to the suffering masses but instead, chaos and economic ruin. Then there is the huge financial cost of all the waste that warfare contractors have benefited from, e.g., F-35 Lightening II multipurpose fighter, the Navy’s littoral ship disaster, burn pits, etc.

    Trump is no pushover given all he has faced with Russia-gate, his personal dalliances before his presidency, his hiring and firing of key cabinet positions, etc. He is a fighter; this second-term campaign exhilarates him primarily because it will feed his megalomaniac personality. Gabbard has to use all her feminine skills without the tears and vocal inflection that could suggest weakness to her male opponent.

    The outcome?

    If Trump wins in 2020, the globalists continue to weave their evil against lesser nations.

    If Gabbard wins the presidency, it would be huge, monumental and unprecedented not only because she would be the first woman elected president but a sitting member of the House of Representatives which has not happened since James Garfield in 1881.

    Politics in America is like stage magic; a three-act structure referred to in the business as the pledge, the turn and the prestige. The “pledge” is offering the electorate a candidate who is an ordinary woman. The “turn” is the candidate who miraculously ascends to high office. The “prestige” is the trick that fools the electorate into believing their will has been served.

    The clever ruse designed by the Democrats is to switch Tulsi Gabbard for criminal Hillary Clinton. Her backup would be the person second in line to the U.S. presidency, that being the Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat too.

    You ask, “How could Hillary Clinton become president if Tulsi Gabbard was elected?” I’ll answer that question by reminding everyone that James Garfield held office for only a few months as the Chief Executive before he was assassinated.

    “Double, double toil and trouble;
    Fire burn and caldron bubble.
    Cool it with a baboon’s blood,
    Then the charm is firm and good.”

    (From Macbeth by William Shakespeare)

  5. JustPassingThrough says

    the dems in disneyland.
    american elites.
    FUBAR

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Anti-Empire