The Fine Print: UK Government Finally Admits PCR Test Generates False Positives

Well that took forever

After months by independent journalists and honest medical professionals raising the alarm about widespread fraudulent use the PCR test, the UK Government has finally admitted, albeit in the fine print of its website, that uninfectious people will test ‘positive’ with a PCR test.

According to the UK government’s own website:

6. SARS-CoV-2 re-testing in staff, patients and residents in health and social care settings

Immunocompetent staff, patients and residents who have tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR should be exempt from routine re-testing by PCR or LFD antigen tests (for example, repeated whole setting screening or screening prior to hospital discharge) within a period of 90 days from their initial illness onset or test (if asymptomatic) unless they develop new COVID-19 symptoms. This is because fragments of inactive virus can be persistently detected by PCR in respiratory tract samples following infection – long after a person has completed their isolation period and is no longer infectious.

In other words, it can never be used as a medical diagnostic test, only as a research tool, something which its Nobel Prize-winning inventor had repeatedly warned about.

Bear in mind that from the beginning of the supposed ‘global pandemic,’ governments and public health officials have told the public that the PCR test is the “gold standard” for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis. However, it has also been clear from the onset that the opposite is true – that the PCR test is the most inaccurate test imaginable, and it’s fraudulent use by the science and medical communities has generated a mountain of false positive “cases” and deaths – all of which officials and corporate opportunists have cynically used to drive every COVID-19 mitigation policy, from social distancing and masks, to lockdowns, school shutdowns, mass vaccinations, waving normal vaccine regulatory and testing procedures, and now vaccine passports. Without the fraudulent use of the PCR test, none of these authoritarian policies would have been possible.

Source: 21st Century Wire

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Sally Snyder
Sally Snyder
1 month ago

Here’s what one government has done to ensure that the number of COVID-19 positive tests remains high:

https://viableopposition.blogspot.com/2021/02/how-governments-are-manipulating-rt-pcr.html

By falsely raising the number of positive tests, governments can better control the masses using fear.

ken
ken
1 month ago

Not new. This info was available when the bs started. The fact they used this test as a diagnostic tool is smoking gun proof the virus does not exist.

In Jan 2007 there was fear of a whooping cough outbreak… pertussis. The PCR found 98 cases. Eight (8)-months after the alarm bell sounded that a whooping cough outbreak may be underway, an email was sent to all parties involved. It was all a false alarm. No one had pertussis. The error rate using PCR testing was 100%!

There is no virus,,, there is no pandemic. There is no vaccine.

All of it invented as cover for the government caused economic disaster and to further the climate change bs.

Mark
1 month ago

See if you recognize this pattern: (1) Deny any knowledge of any mitigating factors or any precept which disagrees with your chosen procedure; (2) Admit the existence, if not the accuracy, of dissenting information only when it is too late to make any difference.

How ’bout this? And I invite you to recall, when you’re finished reading, that the public-health authorities knew this in December of last year.

“Unusually in disease management, a positive test result is the sole criterion for a covid-19 case. Normally, a test is a support for clinical diagnosis, not a substitute. This lack of clinical oversight means we know very little about the proportions of people with positive results who are truly asymptomatic throughout the course of their infection and the proportions who are paucisymptomatic (subclinical), presymptomatic (go on to develop symptoms later), or post-infection (with viral RNA fragments still detectable from an earlier infection).

Earlier estimates that 80% of infections are asymptomatic were too high and have since been revised down to between 17% and 20% of people with infections.12 Studies estimating this proportion are limited by heterogeneity in case definitions, incomplete symptom assessment, and inadequate retrospective and prospective follow-up of symptoms, however.3 Around 49% of people initially defined as asymptomatic go on to develop symptoms.45

It’s also unclear to what extent people with no symptoms transmit SARS-CoV-2. The only test for live virus is viral culture. PCR and lateral flow tests do not distinguish live virus. No test of infection or infectiousness is currently available for routine use.678 As things stand, a person who tests positive with any kind of test may or may not have an active infection with live virus, and may or may not be infectious”

https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4851

A positive result on the PCR test – even if it were accurate for purpose, which it is not – is not a substitute for clinical diagnosis. The public-health mandarins know bupkes about asymptomatic transmission, and are only guessing – sorry; ‘estimating’. The assessed prevalence of asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 dropped 80% in nearly as little time as it takes to type it, from maybe 80% of infections to maybe 20%, at the most. In fact it is not even that, and the Chinese study which could not find a single case of asymptomatic transmission in testing of nearly 10 million people is actually mentioned. The medical community does not know with any degree of certainty – a polite way of saying ‘does not have an effing clue’ – if asymptomatic positives are able to infect others because the only test for live virus is viral culture. In fact, they do not really have an effing clue if you are really positive, because the standard is the PCR test and that is not viral culture.

I’ve read elsewhere that the fallout of this manufactured crisis is going to include a similar contempt for the medical profession as is generally felt for bankers, journalists and lawyers. And if that’s the case, it would be nothing more than justice.

7.62x39
7.62x39
1 month ago

Aleaopathic medicine aka Rockefeller medicine was corrupted at birth. Consider the results of an Israeli doctor strike where the mortality rate went down as a result :

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=israeli+doctor+strike+mortality+rate+went+down&t=brave&ia=web

Perhaps leeches like much like politicians will be re-ntroduced as therapy once again?

Anti-Empire