The CDC Wants Refugees Arriving in America to Eat a Bunch of Ivermectin

Wait, so it's not a "horse dewormer"?

“I have long been convinced that Nature has all the solutions we need to solve our past … that will be the primary source of the treasures and solutions that we seek.” ~Professor Satashi Omura, Nobel co-laureate for the discovery of ivermectin

Looking at 2019 CDC guidance, one has to wonder if one of the reasons why there is such a run on ivermectin is because our own government is using it. And no, not for horses, but for refugees. Yet these same government agencies are running a blood libel-style smear campaign against the drug and its users by misleading people into conflating it with a veterinarian version of the drug, leading many people to think it’s some sort of poison for humans. In the process, they are leaving thousands of COVID patients without any other options for treatment.

It’s not clear whether the hundreds of thousands of Afghan refugees will be forced to get vaccinated like American international travelers, but one thing is clear: They will likely get the ivermectin that most Americans can no longer access. It turns out that in 2019, the CDC issued guidance for refugees from Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East to be given ivermectin pre-emptively for potential infections.

The CDC advises the International Organization for Migration (IOM) physicians who screen the refugees for departure, and U.S. doctors who treat them upon arrival, to prescribe “all Middle Eastern, Asian, North African, Latin American, and Caribbean refugees” with ivermectin and albendazole.

“But that is for parasitic infection, not viral infection!” shouts the chorus of ignorant fools who have ignored the past 18 months of ivermectin saving countless lives. Putting this point aside for a moment, that is only a question about efficacy, not safety.

Government agencies are slandering ivermectin as if it’s not a safe drug and even convincing people that it’s for animals. Do they consider refugees animals?

The point is: People who are now getting COVID – both vaccinated and unvaccinated – are left without any options for outpatient treatment. Why would the government stand in the way of ivermectin treatment that it mass-distributes to refugees, even if the establishment bureaucrats personally believe it won’t help for COVID?

To the extent the government even screens refugees for COVID, will officials suspend ivermectin treatment for a refugee who has COVID alongside a parasitic infection? After all, we are told that somehow one of the safest drugs in the history of humanity suddenly turns unsafe if you want to use it for another ailment. Or perhaps Americans can self-identify as refugees and then obtain prescriptions for this lifesaving drug. The question now is whether the rest of the media that ignored ivermectin’s success for 17 months will continue to call the drug a “horse dewormer” even as it’s administered to Afghan refugees.


The revelation of this CDC guidance demonstrates that ivermectin is not some obscure drug, much less an animal drug that was used one time for humans in Africa many years ago. The agency feels it is needed today in most parts of the world. To suggest that it is not safe is a scandalous lie. Perhaps doctors will have to start punching in the prescription code for abortion or suggest it’s for an Afghan refugee in order to get the prescription filled:

In reality, anyone who thinks that somehow one of the safest and most successful drugs of all time cannot work for other ailments is woefully uninformed. I trust Professor Omura, the man who won the Nobel Prize for developing ivermectin for Merck, over the company itself, which now stands to benefit from an expensive drug it is developing, with which the cheap ivermectin, which is off patent, would interfere.

In March, Omura wrote in the Japanese Journal of Antibiotics that he hopes “ivermectin will be utilized as a countermeasure for COVID-19 as soon as possible.” Ten years ago, Omura observed: “Ivermectin has continually proved to be astonishingly safe for human use. Indeed, it is such a safe drug, with minimal side effects, that it can be administered by non-medical staff and even illiterate individuals in remote rural communities, provided that they have had some very basic, appropriate training.”

Any sampling of the internet will reveal a unique degree of reverence for this drug among all of the (pre-political) literature on ivermectin. For example, in 2017, Nature’s Journal of Antibiotics observed the following about the fact that ivermectin held promise outside use just as an-antiparasitic agent:

Today, ivermectin is continuing to surprise and excite scientists, offering more and more promise to help improve global public health by treating a diverse range of diseases, with its unexpected potential as an antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent being particularly extraordinary. …

Moreover, whereas ivermectin-resistant parasites swiftly appeared in treated animals, as well as in ectoparasites, such as copepods parasitizing salmon in fish farms, somewhat bizarrely and almost uniquely, no confirmed drug resistance appears to have arisen in parasites in human populations, even in those that have been taking ivermectin as a monotherapy for over 30 years.

As for the drug’s exact mechanism of action against COVID, Dr. Ryan Cole, a brilliant Mayo Clinic-trained pathologist, listed eight different mechanisms in an exclusive interview with TheBlaze:

1. Inhibits binding at ACE2 and TMPRSS2, keeping the virus from entering our cells.

2. Blocks alpha/beta importin (the virus cell taxi), keeping it from getting to the nucleus.

3. Blocks the viral replicase zipper (RdRp).

4. 3-Chimotrypsin protease inhibition (keeps the virus from assembling).

5. Ivermectin strengthens our natural antiviral cell activity by increasing our natural interferon production (this counters SARSCOV2 activity, which inhibits cellular interferon).

6. Decreases IL-6 and other inflammatory cytokines through NF Kappa Beta downregulation, taking the patient from a cytokine storm to calm.

7. Binds NSP14, necessary for viral replication, and blocks it (equals less virus).

8. Most important mechanism is inhibiting binding to CD147 receptor on red cells, platelets, lung, and blood cell lining. Ivermectin keeps the virus from binding here and decreases deadly clotting.

For those who want a more detailed explanation of each of these mechanisms, Dr. Cole has provided me with important links and videos, which I posted together in this twitter thread:

So, the next time you hear any media figures refer to ivermectin as an animal medicine, just remember that they are regarding people from three continents as something less than human. And now, they are treating every American – increasingly those who are also vaccinated – as subhuman beings who don’t deserve any treatment until it is too late.

Source: The Blaze

  1. ken says

    Any gov official against the use of any drug that is proven safe and effective for a concoction that has killed tens of thousands and has the capability to kill millions need removed, tried, convicted and punished per the Nuremberg protocols and any statutes that may apply.

    Any medical quack, expert, or person against the use of any drug that is proven safe and effective for a concoction that has killed tens of thousands and has the capability to kill millions need tried, convicted and punished per the Nuremberg protocols and any statutes that may apply.

    It obvious they want to keep those that blindly follow and kill off those that question their motives.

    1. edwardi says

      The Indian Bar Association has launched the first criminal suit against a top CDC official for interfering in their use of Ivermectin.

    2. Eileen Kuch says

      Well, ken, Dr. Anthony Falsie’s indeed a medical quack .. has. been a quack for decades. How many children in 3rd World countries were either paralyzed by the quack’s polio vaccines or died from them? Hundreds of thousands of .children were left paralyzed or died from those polio vaccines. Dr. Falsie should be held to account for what he’s done, period.

  2. Joe_Below says

    A person can completely ignore the 1/10 flu.

  3. Ceco says

    After 7 days of fight with Covid, I noticed this is not just a common flu which goes away after 2 or 3 days. I heard about Ivermectin from a friend and decided to take it. It was no problem for me to get it from the local pharmacy. After taking it, the effect was immediate. I took it for 2 days and that was it. I am in Europe and it is not for animal here but human. It did say that it is dewormer on the package.

    1. Eric Jansen says

      Hi. What was the dosage you took?

    2. Jimmy Scott says

      It is the common cold or flu. It has all the same everything including death toll. You allowed the hype to allow you to believe madness.

    3. flashlight joe says

      The whole “It is a horse dewormer” is just a smear. The drug warfarin is commonly used as a blood thinner and it is rat poison.

      1. b davis says

        Great point flashlight. There’s a whole host of drugs that are formulated for one thing and are used off label for another. Other drugs were developed for certain conditions and then it’s discovered that there were interesting side effects that could be marketed for huge sums of money…….Viagra for one.

  4. yuri says

    AMA is worse than voodoo

  5. Zinsky says

    You really don’t understand the term “blood libel”, do you? That phrase arouse from the foul anti-Semitic lies and scourges of the Inquisition and was used to justify the torture and slaughter of Telling people the facts about a potentially dangerous drug is hardly the same thing! Also, telling people that a drug formulated and approved by the FDA as an anti-parasitic in microgram doses is equally effective in “preventing” or “curing” COVID-19, an airborne, highly contagious betacoronavirus in massive doses, is ignorant, misguided and dangerous. There are no peer-reviewed and appropriately designed studies anywhere in the world that support that assertion. NONE. Please post a link, if you have one. I’m sure it is bogus and fatuous. This website is a fraud.

    1. The True Nolan says

      There are no peer-reviewed and appropriately designed studies anywhere in the world that support that assertion. NONE. “

      By the way, Zinsky, what else are you lying about?

    2. Buren Cullen says

      And you will give us peer-reviewed and appropriately designed studies anywhere in the world that support the FDA’s position.

    3. Chacko Kurian says

      Hey Zinsky are you upset because the Pfizer drug is not being touted by the author of this article? Soon it will be anti Semitic to criticise the Pfizer vaccine.

    4. yuri says

      your nonsense is ludicrous—the FDA and CDC are the frauds—there is plenty of evidence that cheap drugs are more effective at treating many illnesses–the corrupt USA only permits those that enrich Pfizer
      peer review= a group of corrupt peers paid off by big Pharma….the pope peer reviewed Copernicus and Galileo…..and now you’re quacks believe there are 27 genders…all peer reviewed

  6. Val says

    Oh, yeah. No point and giving the refugees (future Democratic voters) the lethal injection, which would go against the intention behind bringing them here.

  7. Dano S. says

    My feeling is that if they were using the vaccine on them, many would die. Since the refugees are being covered by the media closely, it would create a difficult situation for the government to lie their way out of once the Afghans start dropping dead. The government knows Ivermectin is cheaper, safer, and more effective.

    1. skizex says


  8. Buck Willy The Third says

    You traded your natural immunity for genetically modified dependency and rewarded with a crispy creme doughnut. Your death passport justifies pompous grandiosity.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.