Russia’s Defense Minister Hosts Libya’s Haftar in Moscow to Mess With Erdogan

A reminder to Erdogan of another reason not to go too far in Syria's Idlib

Editor’s note: Russia has a small stake in ensuring Libya isn’t home to ISIS or al-Qaeda. Other than that Russia has mainly involved itself with Libya to guard from the isolation campaign Obama was pushing, by making sure the Europeans have no choice but to engage with Moscow if they want Libya solved. Now however Libya has also become useful as a lever vs Erdogan. A Shoigu-Haftar meeting is a useful reminder to the Turkish leader that if he goes to far in Syria, Russia can in turn make things much more difficult for him in Libya  

Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu hosted Khalifa Hifter, the commander of the self-styled Libyan National Army (LNA), in Moscow Feb. 19.

“During the meeting, security issues in the Middle East and North Africa as well as the fight against international terrorism and settlement of the crisis in Libya were discussed,” the Russian Defense Ministry stated. “The important role of negotiations held on Jan. 13, 2020, in Moscow in establishing the cease-fire and launching the normalization process in the country was noted.”

The statement also stressed that the two parties reiterated their respective commitments to a political solution to the conflict.

WHY IT MATTERS: Shoigu has met with Hifter on a number of occasions, including in November 2018 and August 2017. In January 2017, Hifter spoke with Shoigu via a videoconference onboard the Russian carrier “Admiral Kuznetsov,” which, at the time, was positioned off the Libyan coast.

This time the meeting came the day after the LNA attacked the port in Tripoli. The LNA claims it was targeting a storage place for ammunition and the Turkish vessel that allegedly transported arms to the forces of the Government of National Accord (GNA) led by Fayez al-Sarraj.

STRETCHING THE FRONT: The meeting also came amid escalations between Russia and Turkey over Syria’s Idlib region. The latest round of the showdown saw Russia-backed Syrian airstrikes on opposition forces that killed two Turkish servicemen. Moscow later accused Turkey of providing artillery support to militants fighting the Syrian army and said militants briefly broke through Syrian military positions in Idlib. Turkish Defense Minister Hulusi Akar told CNN that Ankara would “no doubt” employ the S-400 missile systems, which it purchased from Russia. He also said Turkey is in talks with the United States over the transfer of Patriot missiles to be used in Idlib to defend Turkish troops against Syrian army attacks.

Russia’s recent moves over Libya suggest the Astana 2.0 deal that Vladimir Putin and Recep Tayyip Erdogan eyed for Libya in early January is in hibernation, at best, and Moscow may be seeking leverage over Ankara, including in Libya. Earlier this month, Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service chief Sergey Naryshkin traveled to the United Arab Emirates for talks with the Emirati leadership.

WHAT’S NEXT? The UN has tried to salvage talks over a cease-fire for Libya after the Tripoli-based GNA announced it was pulling out in response to the shelling of the capital’s port by Hifter’s forces.

The Libyan peace talks began Feb. 18 in Geneva.

A source close to the Russian Defense Ministry told the Russian Vedomosti newspaper that Hifter has proven a tough negotiator for Moscow.

“Hifter says he is all for political settlement, but once some practical steps needed [on his side] he would either decline to sign papers or would ask for time to think them over and would then disappear,” the source stated.

“There haven’t been such issues with Sarraj this far, he is under Erdogan’s full control. In this sense, Hifter is not under anyone’s control. Talks with Shoigu may bring about the effect needed for a temporary truce.”

The question is, given the ongoing tensions in Idlib, would Russia really promote a truce, or would it use the Libyan track to put more pressure on Turkey

Source: Al Monitor

  1. David Chu says

    I have since lost track of who the “good guys” are in Libya since the murder of the Col. Qaddafi. Are these the good guys now???

    1. thomas malthaus says

      Flip a coin.

      Haftar has CIA links. That might be your first clue.

      1. David Chu says

        Bingo! Anyone with/for the Yankees are the “bad guys” in my book.

        1. thomas malthaus says

          I prefer Russia’s choice. I’m a little crazy that way.

        2. rightiswrong rightiswrong says

          In what world are ISIS the good guys?

          The USA loaned Hitler the money for his army, and they supply and transport ISIS butchers around the globe.

          1. David Chu says

            In your little Yankee mind full of CNN/FOX/ETC narratives!

            The USA loaned Hitler the money for his army, and they supply and transport ISIS butchers around the globe.

            HAHAHAHAHAHA! That’s a good laugh for today! Thanks for the comic relief . . .

            1. Séamus Ó Néill says

              The Americans also made tanks and planes fir the Nazi’s….shipped in through North Africa!….that truth is your laugh for tomorrow.

            2. rightiswrong rightiswrong says

              They also shipped oil from Venezuela to France for the Germans, right up until 1945.
              Without that oil, no German tank could have left barracks, let alone traverse throughout the SU.

            3. rightiswrong rightiswrong says

              You must be on Opioids to think CNN would run the truth, or any other of your sites.

              Comedy doesn’t get any better than a fat Pompous toad telling us he won.
              What he won no one knows, except for fat slob of the year award.

            4. Tom Surguine, already signed . says

              Man, oh man…did u or did u not “just nailed it!” Good on ya!!!!!!

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.