“Lukashenko Must Go” — Florida Narcissist Confuses Eastern Europe for His Coloring Book
Who must go?
I think it is very important that the extreme flimsiness of the arguments the Bird-Man rolls out in support of his demand that “Lukashenko must go” does not distract us from the sheer temerity, the chutzpah, and the narcissism of what is going on here.
Imagine that I wrote an article demanding the President of — let’s say — Mauretania “has to go”. What would be your reaction? Would it be to exclaim that I have finally gone insane?
What standing exactly do I have to demand the leader of this or that country that I don’t live in, be regime-changed?
Now, I can write an analysis pointing out the negative aspects of, for example, MBS’s rule in Saudi Arabia. I can even conclude by saying that if someone (preferably his people) toppled him, that — depending on who they replaced him with — they would probably be doing the world and the Peninsula Arabs a favor. This is appropriate, and after all, a matter of subjective opinion. But to move on from this to the state of mind where you’re demanding that this or that foreign leader “must go” — what kind of a megalomaniac God complex is that?? Just how narcissist do you have to be to imagine whether a foreign leader deserves to stay or must be toppled properly hinges on the Great Arbiter—yourself?
It’s absolutely hilarious how this narcissist justifies his regime-change fatwa by referencing…his own feelings:
I have to repeat myself: I have exactly *zero* trust in Lukashenko who, in my opinion, cares only about himself and remaining in power.
But irrespective of how stupid EU politicians are, Belarus is in no condition to take on the entire EU by itself, so at the end of the day, it is Russia that will have to bail Belarus out (yet again!). Personally, I find that unacceptable.
Who gives a flying fuck who you have “trust in” and what you “find unacceptable”? Who the fuck are you? Since when does the legitimacy of a Belarus president rest on the feelings of a Florida blogger?
Is this some new political system you have invented? One where whether a leader gets to stay or “must go” is determined solely by………how Saker feels about them on any given day.
Lukashenko can forget about maintaining effective support in Belarus, just give him the Bird-Man’s phone number so he can check in daily with Florida to see if he’s still legitimate and allowed to stay.
What we’re seeing here is Saker now fully embracing the narcissism and the God complex of his erstwhile liberal interventionist antagonists (now allies of convenience in Belarus).
They too imagine themselves the rightful arbiters of which foreign leaders get to stay and which “must go”. And they too issue their rulings based on…their feelings.
The liberal bombardiers like to issue their regime-change fatwas based on the feeling of pity. They like to come up with fantasizes of baby seals being clubbed by Nazis and then assign one side the baby seal role, and bomb and regime-change the other side. This makes them feel like big heroes who just liberated Auschwitz without having left their couch.
Saker’s source of aggravation against Lukashenko meanwhile is, shall we say, ‘unknown’. I say unknown because the case the Bird-Man lays out against the leader of the White Rus is — as will be shown — so incredibly retarded that it is very difficult to take it as being in good faith at all.
Somebody tell this clown Eastern Europe isn’t his coloring book. Toppling and raising up its leaders is not his job. Or his prerogative.