Iran Refuses to Finger Saudi Arabia in Red Sea Tanker Oil Spill

Somebody trying to set up an Iranian-Saudi war?

Editor’s note: Since Tehran has now retracted most of the story some are left wondering if anything happened at all, however, there are other possibilities why Iranians may have decided to do a U-turn and start playing down the incident: A.) Perhaps they realized advertising attack on their crude shipment merely detracted from their prestige and was going to make deniability harder when they decided to serve their revenge against the Saudis cold, or B.) They began to suspect it was a third party that struck them trying to get them to lash out at the Saudis, and cause a more serious conflict.


An Iranian-owned oil tanker has been attacked in the Red Sea off the coast of Saudi Arabia, Iran’s foreign ministry says.

The ministry said the tanker Sabiti had been hit twice, causing some damage.

Earlier Iran’s national oil company (NIOC) said two explosions on the vessel had been caused “likely by missiles”.

But it dismissed earlier reports quoting it as saying the missiles were likely to have come from Saudi Arabia.

In recent months “other sabotage acts” had been carried out against Iranian tankers in the Red Sea and these were being investigated, foreign ministry spokesman Abbas Mousavi said.

The incident took place at 04:50 (01:50 GMT) about 95km (60 miles) from the Saudi city of Jeddah, Iran’s Mehr news agency said.

Two of the vessel’s tanks were struck, it added, causing damage measuring between 0.5m and 1.5m. There were no reports of injuries.

The Sabiti is now sailing towards the Gulf, Mehr said.

The reports have so far only come from Iranian sources. There has been no comment from Saudi officials.

Iranian state TV earlier identified the vessel as the Sinopa, but the NIOC later said it was the Sabiti.

Pictures allegedly taken on Friday aboard the Sabiti have been published by Iranian state TV, showing no visible signs of damage.


Did anything actually happen?

Paul Adams, BBC Diplomatic Correspondent

This story is as clear as mud. It seemed to change. Two different ships have been named – the Sinopa and the Sabiti. We had reports of missiles striking the tanker and then an accusation briefly levelled against Saudi Arabia for committing what was described as an “act of terrorism”. That claim seems to have been dropped quite quickly.

And crucially there is no independent evidence at all that the vessel was struck. Pictures were released later in the morning showing nothing untoward. And most crucially both tankers are currently steaming at full speed in their different directions so there is no evidence that either vessel has been impaired in any way. [However the tanker has now changed course so that instead of proceeding to the Suez it is now returning to the Persian Gulf.]

Publicly available ship tracking records show both ships are currently in the Red Sea. The Sinopa turned its transmitter on earlier this week for the first time in more than 50 days. The Sabiti, meanwhile, turned its tracker on early Friday after nearly 60 days of no transmissions.

Under international regulations, all vessels above a certain tonnage must be fitted with the trackers, known as automatic identification systems (AIS). But ships are not required to have their AIS turned on all the time.

A source at maritime analytics firm Windward told the BBC it was common for Iranian tankers to turn off AIS to avoid detection – often to evade international sanctions or harassment from Saudi Arabia.

Because of safety regulations, vessels must have their AIS switched on when they are close to the Suez Canal. The Windward source said Sabiti was behaving unusually because, when going through the canal, it only switches on its AIS when rules require – but in this instance, the AIS had been turned on hundreds of miles from the Suez after being “dark” for two months.

Michelle Bockmann, an analyst at shipping newspaper Lloyds List, told the BBC that the tanker – whichever one it was – was “probably” carrying oil to Syria.

“That really is, along with China, the only market there is for Iranian crude now since the US tightened sanctions in May,” said Ms Bockmann. “We’re seeing geopolitics playing out within the global shipping and tanker markets, and this is just an extension of the instability that we’re seeing in the region.”

The latest incident came amid heightened tension between Iran and Saudi Arabia in recent months.

Last month, 18 drones and seven cruise missiles hit a major oil field and processing facility in Saudi Arabia, which blamed Iran for the attack.

And US officials said Iran was responsible for attacks on two oil tankers in the Gulf in June and July, as well as attacks on another four tankers in May.

Iran denied involvement in all the incidents.

Source: BBC

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
4 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

John C Carleton
John C Carleton
9 months ago

The Iranians have truth and honor, unlike the Ratschilds.

Iranians know the Red Shield dragon is behind this.

Now, lets talk about something really imp[ortant!

The Ole Fake “queen and her Pedophile son murdered my Cousin Lady DI, when are the murderers going to be HANGED?

Lady Di called em big Lizards I think.

They are commoner lizards, their claim to fame running through a commoner archer, the Princes slut wife used for a dildo while the prince was away.

Edward the 4th, was a bastard of non Royal linage on his fathers side, so all monarchs in England after him, were and are fakes!

So was Richard the 3ed a bastard not of the right or claimed linage.
He was a bastard also.
There are historic records to back up Edward the 4th being a bastard, and DNA evidence to prove Richard the 3ed was a bastard.

So you see, the queen ain’t not queen, and her child raping son is no prince.

To include the common lizard and the Pedophile son she hatched, no chin Charle, who wears a kilt because children can hear zippers.

Lady Di was of the right Bloodline, and she was a Royal, unlike the fake common lizards which murdered her, and are squatting at Buckingham palace on Public Assistance!

It comes to me, a curse has been placed on the Isles, and will remain in place until these two swing in space.
And you folks England, better lock up your children until they do!

John C Carleton
The Ole Dog!

Séamus Ó Néill
Séamus Ó Néill
9 months ago

This definitely has the paw prints of the Palestinian squatter all over it. The know nothing but satanic evil and have an insatiable lust for warfare and murder !

James Willy
James Willy
9 months ago

Of course it was the lizards telling bibi to do the attack. Lets hope the Iranians will retaliate to the proper place and sink a few of there boats or else these zioz will just do it again. Retaliation MUST be quick and hard each time these rats launch a new provocation. At least Iran fights back sometimes at least. Not enough in my opinion.

John Rourke
John Rourke
9 months ago

my guess.. it is Israel..Saudis wouldn’t risk it..Israel bombs everyone in the area as it knows it has the US and NATO protection.

Anti-Empire