Iran Drops India From Strategic Rail Project to Afghanistan, Cites Funding Delay

Modi claimed strategic interest in opening up communications to Afghanistan circumventing Pakistan but failed to actually provide any of the promised $1.6bn

Four years after India and Iran signed an agreement to construct a rail line from Chabahar port to Zahedan, along the border with Afghanistan, the Iranian government has decided to proceed with the construction on its own, citing delays from the Indian side in funding and starting the project.

Last week, Iranian Transport and Urban Development Minister Mohammad Eslami inaugurated the track-laying process for the 628 km Chabahar-Zahedan line, which will be extended to Zaranj across the border in Afghanistan. Officials told The Hindu that the entire project would be completed by March 2022, and that Iranian Railways will proceed without India’s assistance, using approximately $400 million from the Iranian National Development Fund.

The development comes as China finalises a massive 25-year, $400 billion strategic partnership deal with Iran, which could cloud India’s plans.

Trilateral agreement

The railway project, which was being discussed between the Iranian Railways and the state-owned Indian Railways Construction Ltd (IRCON), was meant to be part of India’s commitment to the trilateral agreement between India, Iran and Afghanistan to build an alternate trade route to Afghanistan and Central Asia.

In May 2016, during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Tehran to sign the Chabahar agreement with Iranian President Rouhani and Afghanistan President Ghani, IRCON had signed an MoU with the Iranian Rail Ministry.

The MoU was to construct the Chabahar-Zahedan railway as “part of transit and transportation corridor in trilateral agreement between India, Iran and Afghanistan”. IRCON had promised to provide all services, superstructure work and financing for the project (around $1.6 billion).

However, despite several site visits by IRCON engineers, and preparations by Iranian railways, India never began the work, ostensibly due to worries that these could attract U.S. sanctions. The U.S. had provided a sanctions waiver for the Chabahar port and the rail line to Zahedan, but it has been difficult to find equipment suppliers and partners due to worries they could be targeted by the U.S., said officials. India has already “zeroed out” its oil imports from Iran due to U.S. sanctions.

The Ministry of External Affairs and IRCON declined to comment on the issue.

However, when asked if the MoU with IRCON had been cancelled, now that the project has been started without it, an official said India could still join at a “later date.”

25-year Strategic Partnership

Meanwhile, complicating matters further, Iran and China are close to finalising a 25-year Strategic Partnership which will include Chinese involvement in Chabahar’s duty free zone, an oil refinery nearby, and possibly a larger role in Chabahar port as well.

According to leaked versions of the 18-page “Comprehensive Plan for Cooperation between Iran and China”, being finalised by officials in Tehran and Beijing, the cooperation will extend from investments in infrastructure, manufacturing and upgrading energy and transport facilities, to refurbishing ports, refineries and other installations, and will commit Iranian oil and gas supplies to China during that period.

Iranian officials denied a report that also suggested Chabahar port, where India took, will be leased to China. However, Iran proposed a tie-up between the Chinese-run Pakistani port at Gwadar and Chabahar last year, and has offered interests to China in the Bandar-e-Jask port 350km away from Chabahar, as well as in the Chabahar duty free zone.

Each of those possibilities should be watched closely by New Delhi, said former Ambassador to Iran, K.C. Singh. “[The Iran-China deal] impinges on India’s “strategic ties” with Iran and the use of Chabahar port. Jask lies to west of Chabahar & right before Straits of Hormuz. China would thus extends its control along the Pakistan-Iran coast,” he cautioned.

Source: The Hindu

  1. Tommy Jensen says

    We India is Europe because we also have cricket and golf. Our mother language is English in our hearts. We is not like Iran and Afghanistan.

    We am Europe like you. We was occupied and fokked but India raise up again to be like you in Europe.

  2. Rowdy-Yates says

    Israel through America’s war with China, will make sure India’s commitments are broken, its future is shattered and its poverty ensured. It is a Talmudic promise to a Pagan civilization which is never openly stated but constantly reminded as in the scene of Hindus eating monkey brains in the movie “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom” (the Temple of Doom is India)

  3. cechas vodobenikov says

    India plays the double game—this increases the importance of china, Pakistan, Iran in the region and reduces Indian influence in nations such as Afghanistan, Africa, etc—India has lost influence in S Africa, Fiji, Tanzania, Seychelles—where many rich Indians hide their money—except for Nepal India has little influence. they have made great strides in the past 2 decades, partly due to BRICS…tensions w China do not predict that the future will so wonderful for ordinary Indians outside of the tourist hippie enclave of Goa

  4. Alternate History says

    Indians seem to be agreement averse as ‘you know who’.

  5. Bob avlon says

    Modi became a double man now. He can’t move without a US nod making it useless to deal with him. Inside India he did a lot of helpful things and improved its economy.

  6. Rowdy-Yates says

    What stands out about America’s relationship with India and Indian Asia is that it is completely blanked out by the Media, the Academia, the publishing houses and Hollywood. Except for superficial coverage India as an Asian giant gets none and its Hindu/Buddhist/Sikh/Jain along with its Muslim and Christian civilizations gets zero coverage.

    In the face of that blanking out any major movie on India takes center stage and there is no movie as insulting to the strictly vegetarian diet of Hindus, Jains, most Buddhists and most Indians than this movie “Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom” especially when compared to its predecessor the Lost ark which is almost reverential in its treatment of the Jewish Arc of the Covenant.

    A HIndu dish like this as portrayed by Hollywood in that Temple of Doom should have got that movie banned for gross bigotry. California and Hollywood know too well about Hinduism to do such an ugly act against it. It is worse than destroying its temples. It has poisoned impressionable minds against that faith. In the context that India and Indian troops are now waging a war against China mainly for the benefit of the US and Israel this image should be a reminder how the US and Israel wish others to see Hinduism

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.