If We Want to Keep Surviving Frigid Winters, We Are Going to Have to Keep Burning Fossil Fuels — and Lots of Them

Of course, it's an open question if the global technocracy and the eco kooks would mind all that much if we froze to death

Not to mention having a diesel tank of your own makes you far more self-reliant which is a problem all in itself for the technocrats

The massive blast of Siberia-like cold that is wreaking havoc across North America is proving that if we humans want to keep surviving frigid winters, we are going to have to keep burning natural gas — and lots of it — for decades to come.

That cold reality contradicts the “electrify everything” scenario that’s being promoted by climate change activists, politicians, and academics. They claim that to avert the possibility of catastrophic climate change, we must stop burning hydrocarbons and convert all of our transportation, residential, commercial, and industrial systems so that they are powered solely on electricity, with most of that juice coming, of course, from forests of wind turbines and oceans of solar panels.

But attempting to electrify everything would concentrate our energy risks on an electricity grid that is already breaking under the surge in demand caused by the crazy cold weather.

Across America, countless people don’t have electricity. I’m one of them. Our power here in central Austin went out at about 3 am. I am writing this under a blanket, have multiple layers of clothes on, and am nervously watching my laptop’s battery indicator. 

This blizzard proves that attempting to electrify everything would be the opposite of anti-fragile. Rather than make our networks and critical systems more resilient and less vulnerable to disruptions caused by extreme weather, bad actors, falling trees, or simple negligence, electrifying everything would concentrate our dependence on a single network, the electric grid, and in doing so make nearly every aspect of our society prone to catastrophic failure if — or rather, when — a widespread or extended blackout occurs.

This blizzard proves that we have not been taking our energy security seriously enough. The concept of energy security has many aspects. But the most fundamental one is that we all have enough reliable and affordable energy (of whatever type) so that we don’t freeze to death during cold spells like the one now wreaking havoc across the continent.

This blizzard proves that during extreme weather winter, solar panels and wind turbines are of little or no value to the electric grid.

This blizzard proves that our natural gas grid is part of our critical infrastructure and that we shut it down at our peril. The natural gas network is essential because it can deliver big surges in energy supplies during periods of peak demand. In January 2019, U.S. natural gas demand set a record of 145 billion cubic feet per day. That record will be smashed during this blizzard, and daily volumes will exceed 150 Bcf. That is an enormous amount of energy. In fact, on the coldest days of winter, the amount of energy delivered by the gas grid is roughly three times as great as the energy consumed during the hottest days of the summer

During peak cold events like this one, the gas grid delivers about 80 Bcf/d to homes and businesses. In energy equivalent terms, that’s roughly 83 trillion Btu, or the energy output of about 1 terawatt of electric generation capacity for 24 hours. Put another way, to equal the 80 Bcf/d of gas delivered during cold snaps, the U.S. would need an electric grid as large as all existing generation in the country, which is currently about 1.2 terawatts

Thanks to excellent geology, a century of gas production, and a fully developed transmission and distribution grid, the domestic natural gas sector can deliver surges of the fuel that are, in fact, lifesaving. That is due, in large part, to the fact that we can store vast amounts of gas and only tiny quantities of electricity. In short, our electric grid simply cannot deliver the massive amounts of energy needed during the winter to keep us from freezing to death. That means we need to keep burning natural gas. If you prefer to rely on batteries, be my guest.

It’s essential to note that the blizzard and blackouts that are paralyzing the country are occurring at roughly the same time that some of America’s most famous activists and politicians are saying we should quit using all hydrocarbons and dozens of cities across the country are imposing bans on the use of natural gas.

On January 22, Bill McKibben, the founder of 350.org and arguably America’s most famous environmentalist, published an article in the New Yorker in which he said if there is a “basic rule of thumb for dealing with the climate crisis, it would be: stop burning things” including natural gas. McKibben says we should shift our energy needs to solar and wind energy.

Six days later, on January 28, in his state of the city address, Mayor Bill de Blasio declared that New York City will “renounce fossil fuels fully” and “ban fossil fuel connections in the city by the end of this decade, literally ensuring that our only choice is renewable energy.”

As I showed in a report last year for the Foundation for Research on Equal Opportunity, dozens of communities in California have banned or restricted the use of natural gas. According to the Sierra Club, 42 California communities have now imposed bans. So has the city of Seattle. In Massachusetts, about a dozen towns have partnered with the Rocky Mountain Institute, which recently got a $10 million grant from the Bezos Earth Fund, to advocate for the right to ban the use of natural gas in homes and commercial buildings.

In addition to being bad for energy security, these bans are a form of regressive tax on the poor and the middle class because they compel consumers to use electricity, which costs four times more than natural gas on an energy equivalent basis. Despite these very cold facts, it is certain that the efforts to ban natural gas and electrify everything will continue.

I am pro-electricity and electrification. Over the past year, I’ve published a book (A Question of Power: Electricity and the Wealth of Nations) and co-produced a documentary (Juice: How Electricity Explains the World)  that spotlights electricity and why we need many terawatts of new generation capacity to bring the 3 billion people in the world who are now living in energy poverty out of the dark and into the bright lights of modernity. But more than being pro-electricity, I am pro-human. The ongoing blizzard is proving our vulnerability to extreme weather events and it is showing that we can’t rely on electricity alone.

Events like the September 11 attacks, Superstorm Sandy, and the coronavirus proved that we need to make our society more resilient to threats of all kinds. A robust natural gas grid helps our resilience. Electrifying everything will do the opposite.

Source: Forbes

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
12 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Voz 0db
2 months ago

Ah… Umans having FUN!

Well just look at Germany… And don’t make the same mistakes with solar panel and wind farms!

Kieran DSouza
2 months ago
Reply to  Voz 0db

Germany is correcting all warped past policies with Nordstream 2 cheaper gas from Russia in billions of cc which can energize whole of Europe once it is completed in a matter of months. If Merkel can see this through, this will be one big plus to rectify all her past failures

eckbach
eckbach
2 months ago
Reply to  Kieran DSouza

Gotta heat millions of Muslim homes.

SteveK9
SteveK9
2 months ago
ken
ken
2 months ago

Imagine the chaos if all the transportation were EV’s which is what their goal is, Batteries cannot operate very well below 20 degrees,,, at 0 your dead in the ice.

Some in Texas are using their vehicles for heat. No can do with EV’s.

So go ahead Americans… let your politicians and the satanic environmental cults determine what power you will be “allowed” to use and be prepared to die which of course, you dying, is their primary goal

Jim Richardson
Jim Richardson
2 months ago

The Liberal Environmentalists who think every mud puddle is a wetland need to be jerked into reality. Their insane policy ideas will lead to disaster if we don’t correct things quickly. We must clean up the environment but freezing to death is not the way to do it.

GMC
GMC
2 months ago

Someday, Americans will realize that nationalizing your natural resources and keeping your utility departments locally owned by the people, the only way to keep the communities safe from mother nature – or weather weapons.lol Of course Chavez did this in Venezuela, in order to bring his people out of poverty, but paid with his life. And the US Globalist run USA – got even with sanctions. Now the Venezuelans are back where they started, but at least they know their enemies now.

NobodyUKnow
NobodyUKnow
2 months ago

The idea that you can live in a cold climate that gets reasonable amounts of sunlight for only four months of the year, and unreliable wind patterns year-round is batshit crazy.

Before we go whole hog on renewables and get rid of all fossil fuels, I recommend that we first force all the eco-kooks to live in northern Canada in the winter, spring and fall months and heat their homes solely with renewables like wind and solar.

Make sure that they’re being monitored 24/7 to ensure they don’t cheat by using wood or propane gas for heat.

It will be interesting to see how long they last, and even more interesting to see how long they cling to their delusional ideas after having had to live solely with renewable sources of energy in a cold and harsh climate.

Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon
2 months ago

What no one wants to talk about is insulation. It keeps warm air in and cold air out during the winter, while in summer it keeps cool air in and hot air out. Whether manufactured insulation, or insulation by mass building, it reduces energy consumption dramatically. Argon gas filled triple pane windows help. Yes, it costs more to build, but the reduced consumption rates pay for it.
Don’t even think about geothermal heating and cooling, which is essentially “free” other than the construction costs.

BADGER BADGERISM
BADGER BADGERISM
2 months ago

i got something to say to Liberal Left Idiots:
NEW ICE AGE…take that and do the research

strom
strom
2 months ago

I predicted these events. The events are less spaced. I stored a lot of wood in my backyard. If everything collapses I’ll use my natural gas fireplace by breaking the glass and ventilate outside to not die from CO and burn the wood. I was thinking how to ventilate out by not allowing cold draft from seeping through. The fix will be for a few weeks the most i thought because I did not store big quantities of wood. I’m still thinking how to do it. Maybe people in this forum throw ideas I’ll bring all the family in one spot near the fire with blankets. Fascinating That I was right but pity the people in Texas specially the vulnerable like children and the weak.

Last edited 2 months ago by strom
abinico warez
abinico warez
2 months ago

Huh? Eskimos have survived in frigid cold without burning anything.

Anti-Empire