How the CDC Is Manipulating Data to Prop Up “Vaccine Effectiveness”

"If you apply them only to the vaccinated, but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated..."


The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease.

They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).

The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway.

Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:

1. False-postive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)

2. Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms.

Without these two policies, there would never have been an appreciable pandemic at all, and now the CDC has enacted two policy changes which means they no longer apply to vaccinated people.

Firstly, they are lowering their CT value when testing samples from suspected “breakthrough infections”.

From the CDC’s instructions for state health authorities on handling “possible breakthrough infections” (uploaded to their website in late April):

For cases with a known RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) value, submit only specimens with Ct value ≤28 to CDC for sequencing. (Sequencing is not feasible with higher Ct values.)

Throughout the pandemic, CT values in excess of 35 have been the norm, with labs around the world going into the 40s.

Essentially labs were running as many cycles as necessary to achieve a positive result, despite experts warning that this was pointless (even Fauci himself said anything over 35 cycles is meaningless).

But NOW, and only for fully vaccinated people, the CDC will only accept samples achieved from 28 cycles or fewer. That can only be a deliberate decision in order to decrease the number of “breakthrough infections” being officially recorded.

Secondly, asymptomatic or mild infections will no longer be recorded as “covid cases”.

That’s right. Even if a sample collected at the low CT value of 28 can be sequenced into the virus alleged to cause Covid19, the CDC will no longer be keeping records of breakthrough infections that don’t result in hospitalisation or death.

From their website:

As of May 1, 2021, CDC transitioned from monitoring all reported vaccine breakthrough cases to focus on identifying and investigating only hospitalized or fatal cases due to any cause. This shift will help maximize the quality of the data collected on cases of greatest clinical and public health importance. Previous case counts, which were last updated on April 26, 2021, are available for reference only and will not be updated moving forward.

Just like that, being asymptomatic – or having only minor symptoms – will no longer count as a “Covid case” but only if you’ve been vaccinated.

The CDC has put new policies in place which effectively created a tiered system of diagnosis. Meaning, from now on, unvaccinated people will find it much easier to be diagnosed with Covid19 than vaccinated people.


Person A has not been vaccinated. They test positive for Covid using a PCR test at 40 cycles and, despite having no symptoms, they are officially a “covid case”.

Person B has been vaccinated. They test positive at 28 cycles, and spend six weeks bedridden with a high fever. Because they never went into a hospital and didn’t die they are NOT a Covid case.

Person C, who was also vaccinated, did die. After weeks in hospital with a high fever and respiratory problems. Only their positive PCR test was 29 cycles, so they’re not officially a Covid case either.

The CDC is demonstrating the beauty of having a “disease” that can appear or disappear depending on how you measure it.

To be clear: If these new policies had been the global approach to “Covid” since December 2019, there would never have been a pandemic at all.

If you apply them only to the vaccinated, but keep the old rules for the unvaccinated, the only possible result can be that the official records show “Covid” is much more prevalent among the latter than the former.

This is a policy designed to continuously inflate one number, and systematically minimise the other.

What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?

Source: Off Guardian

  1. Ronnie says

    Lies, lies and more dam lies. Is there no end to it. Is there no beginning for only the truth !
    This entire fraud will implode into war and revolution world wide.
    Humanity is stupid enough to do it all over again, and that’s for sure.

  2. ken says

    “What is that if not an obvious and deliberate act of deception?”

    The first thing I did last year was to watch videos of Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR. I knew the test would be central to the disease. Mullis said his PCR was never intended to, and should not be, used as a diagnostic test. That was good enough for me.

    One would think the inventor would know what he was talking about? Normally an inventor would be happy to see his baby being used for various new uses but Mullis saw Fauci using it fraudulently on AIDS patients claiming HIV caused AIDS. He also disliked Fauci saying Fauci was a stupid bureaucrat. (agreed)

    Mullis died just before the launch of the Covid con. (lucky for them eh?) Just why the peoples of the world would to listen to lying government bureaucrats over an intelligent inventor is a mystery. It’s almost as if they wanted to be part of some history making event even though it was an obvious blooming fraud.

    These bureaucrats have lied,,, lie by lie,,, at each step of this fraud. They have created a sickness cult that would make Jim Jones cringe in envy. Now that cult is amplifying the lies.

    That same sickness cult claiming their health is at risk when they see a unmasked person, have no problem taking an unproven, untested, experimental concoction that edits the DNA of your cells,,, a concoction that killed all the animals tested in Pharmas attempts to get FDA approval, a concoction that has killed more people in four months than all vaccines combined over the last eleven years.

    Also note the death rate in the chart. Even the death rate for those 80+ don’t come close to a real pandemic.

    Now a ‘thinking’ individual might want to avoid a concoction like this but thinking isn’t a requirement in the cult. Obedience is the new model,,, even if it kills them.

  3. Mark says

    I read commentary by someone, on a blog, who forecast this very accurately. Unfortunately I can’t remember where I read it. Anyway, the author (I think it was at OffGuardian) claimed the authorities – and that’s who western governments have become, a faceless totalitarian golem called ‘;the authorities’ – would manipulate the PCR test results to make it appear the vaccines were enjoying wild success, unprecedented effectiveness.

    Think about it. Although our modern technical prowess is such that Moderna could whip up a mRNA cocktail against The Covid in only two days, and although the PCR test was accused early as inaccurate in the manner it was being used and was subsequently declared officially to result in a high proportion of false positives…we’re still using it. None of those incredibly-brilliant researchers has come up with a more accurate test, and the PCR remains the gold standard, although ever-faster-working home tests have been developed so you can test yourself before a trip, against that distant day when you are allowed to go on anything like a trip. The PCR test suits the authorities’ manipulations perfectly, so it has never been replaced.

    I must admit, though, I don’t think anyone ever imagined they would simultaneously use two different standards of assessment – one for the vaccinated and the other for the unvaccinated – and that smacks of an audacity and confidence I think few could have anticipated.

  4. John says

    So – more disinformation. This article isn’t even remotely accurate. So far, that’s two for two articles I’ve read that are just utter garbage.

  5. John says

    The conjecture in this ridiculous article is absolutely mind blowing. And you people fell for it. Typical.

    1. yuri says

      for dimwit w little mind to blow

  6. yuri says

    how does an illness w a 99.7% recovery rate create so much hysteria? 900$ billion profit in 3 months for Pfizer alone is 1 explanation
    many vaccines are effective and safe—polio, diphtheria etc
    AstraZeneca now banned by several nations and restrictions placed on Pfizer Moderna, Johnson/johnson due to allergic reactions some deaths

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.