Hong Kong Mob Protesters Rule the Streets

Few dare speak up against their violence for fear of reprisals they have been very willing to dish out

On the streets and in the grounds of their university near the harbourfront on the Kowloon side of Hong Kong, masked students draw powerful bows and fire sharpened arrows at police and ­civilians with reckless abandon.

They fill drums with petrol and loot dangerous chemicals from the Hong Kong Polytechnic Univer­sity’s science laboratories to create highly flammable weapons and throw fire at police.

In this volatile atmosphere, anyone who publicly challenges their cause, who seeks to call out the violence and the damage, is at risk of fierce reprisal.

The strategy has been working.

A Hong Kong-based lawyer friend and long-time contact yelled at me on Monday while echoing the sentiments of many here, furious at what they see as “appalling bias” in reporting which has glossed over the violence and vandalism of the protesters.

“You’re a journalist and you guys are responsible for a lot of this now. Every camera is pointed in one direction to paint this false narrative of the police as brutal bastards and the protesters as ­heroic democrats with a noble cause,” he said. “The coverage emboldens them and now they think they can get away with anything.”

My friend is a fearless defence lawyer but he won’t go on the ­record. “There’s mob rule and people who speak out against it risk getting their heads kicked in.”

Many here are now cowed into silence. A prominent Australian Hong Kong businesswoman told me: “No one is prepared to speak on the record because media is fuelling this as a spectator sport — it’s not. These are our friends, our family, our staff. This is not some opportunity for political grandstanding or inflaming the situation. We’re heartbroken at what has happened and how the Hong Kong government has failed to take any accountability.”

Teenagers are running away from home to join the protests. Schools are closed and children as young as 10 are joining front lines.

These streets which are now the scenes of fierce battles are fondly familiar to me from six years living and reporting in Hong Kong before and after the 1997 handover of the British colony to China, and multiple visits over the past 20 years. But the chaos, fear and loathing on the streets now is intimidating and there’s no end in sight.

There’s a multitude of catalysts for the mayhem — anger over the number of mainland Chinese coming in and burdening the health system and lengthening the public housing queues; anger among the young that they’re not as prosperous as their parents; anger at the ineptitude and arrogance of the Hong Kong government, a bureaucratic, overly privileged and pale shadow of its former self; and anger that this city is and always was part of China and will one day be completely enveloped with the likely loss of fundamental freedoms.

But the anger has become uncontrolled and dangerous to such an extreme that it threatens to do worse long-term damage.

A mainland Chinese man who had already been beaten up by protesters was splashed with lighter fluid and ignited last week, resulting in horrific burns, for daring to demand the mob put down their weapons and make peace.

The iPhone video of this callous, permanently disfiguring ­attack has been widely shared, but the attacker remains free and the protesters have suffered little damage to their brand.

An elderly man was killed last week by a brick thrown by one of the protesters. But any recriminations over this unlawful killing are drowned out by the protesters’ claims of police brutality.

“A university is supposed to be a breeding ground for young talents but it has unfortunately become a battlefield for criminal and rioters,” Chief Superintendent of Police, public relations branch, Mr Kwok Ka-chuen, said at a press conference on Monday.

Some Chinese students from the mainland who speak a distinctive dialect and not the Cantonese of Hong Kong are afraid to talk in public, fearful it will lead to a public beating or a brick in the back of the head. The hapless police are in a no-win situation. Molotov cocktails, bricks prised from the pavement, iron bars — anything with the potential to cause injury or death to police — are hurled at police who surround the protesters. But unlike in the past when this level of civil disobedience would not have been tolerated, police are hamstrung by the weak leadership of government. So they stand back, taking too long to move in, clear the radicals and restore order.

The masked protesters give placid interviews to international and local journalists and speak of their determination to achieve democracy in Hong Kong. Yet despite their violence and escalating aggression, they’re invariably depicted as brave freedom fighters standing up for democracy.

At any other time in Hong Kong, or in any other place, these people would be condemned as brutal thugs, guilty of at least some of the excesses of the Chinese Communist Party that the protesters rail against.

Yonden Lhatoo, the South China Morning Post’s chief news editor and a former colleague, wrote bravely:“You can literally count on your fingers the number of people with the courage to say anything aloud nowadays against the destruction of our city. The ­reality is there are thousands of youngsters on the streets who have tasted blood and become intoxicated by the success of mob rule. They are supported by a massive demographic that includes lawyers, teachers, doctors and other professionals who constantly gloss over and find excuses for all the outrageous excesses on the front lines of the anti-government movement.” He fears for the police “because you can already see discipline among frontline officers unravelling as they reach the end of their tether”.

Businesswoman Annie Wu Suk-ching, heiress to one of Hong Kong’s largest restaurant groups, saw her eateries trashed and boycotted after she spoke out against the protests. Ms Wu gave media interviews and spoke at the United Nations Human Rights Council in September, criticising a small group of protesters for “systematic and calculated violent acts”.

Several of her outlets, such as Maxim’s and Arome bakeries, Genki Sushi and local Starbucks franchises, were smashed and vandalised. Conversely, her views won praise on the mainland, including in the China Daily.

Chinese and expatriate friends and contacts are bracing for worse to come. Their businesses, homes and livelihoods are under serious threat as a clueless bureaucratic cadre in the Hong Kong government shows how a lack of political savvy and practical experience can make a terrible crisis worse.

One of the world’s miracle economies and financial centres is reeling. Its well-resourced and highly disciplined police force has been cast by the protesters and influential sections of the local and international media as a public enemy. The protesters are Hong Kong’s enemy right now, but few dare say it.

Source: The Australian

  1. Vish says

    This Australian article glosses over the 1000-pound elephant in the living room: America’s hands in fomenting the “pro-democracy” riots in the first place.

    Evocative of similar tactics that America uses in its regime change operations around the world, the USA will weaponize and manipulate “swarming youth” as cannon fodder and useful idiots to destabilize a targeted government or nation. See America’s hand in the 2014 Ukrainian “Maidan” regime change coup.

    This is all part of America’s hybrid war campaign against any nation that stands in the way of America’s unipolar world order.

    The American Empire of Chaos instinctively sows chaos around the world … and then in Orwellian fashion calls it “Democracy.”

    Behind a made-for-TV Hong Kong protest narrative, Washington is backing nativism and mob violence

    Hong Kong protesters trained at Oslo Freedom Forum before anti-extradition protest, past speakers include Denise Ho, HK singer and political activist and Al Qaida affiliated White Helmet, Raed al-Saleh

    The ‘Hong Kong Human Rights & Democracy Act’ Will Intensify the Hybrid War on China

    A New Gladio in Action: Ukrainian Postmodern Coup Completes Testing of New Template

  2. LS says

    If I were in charge I would order the ‘protestors’ shot on sight (and anyone who complained about it). Then I would impose a One Country–One System policy by force.

    I would also implement a mandatory political education program. The main goal of which would be to eliminate political ignorance and fantasy.

    Repeat after me, ignorant youth: “All systems are oligarchies.”

  3. JustPassingThrough says

    you see a foto of 2 archers.
    if this were anything more than a game,
    you would see a foto of 2 dead or wounded archers.
    a game for the “hearts and minds” of the hong kong citizens.
    it will get to the point that CN will be asked to come in.
    that’s the game, isn’t it?

  4. CHUCKMAN says

    China’s government is being extremely cautious.

    But they are damned if they do and damned if they don’t.

    I admire the restraint.

    People have so little perspective, but here is is a voice from Australia – a country normally on-side with the US in almost all matters, a US now calling the Chinese restraint barbaric – calling for the opposite of Washington.

    We should remember, a number of times in the past, when the US itself took far more deadly action than what we see Hong Kong police doing to violent demonstrators.

    It shot people in the streets for such behavior. Just once instance of many was Detroit, 1967, when forty or so people were killed by the National Guard.

    It shot people too in Chicago, Los Angeles, and other cities. Following Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans, the National Guard and police killed a number of people in the lootings.

    1. David Bedford says

      Occupy Wall Street comes to mind.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.