Half of Democrats Support Deporting the mRNA-Untreated to ‘Designated Facilities’, Fining People for Questioning the Vax

Fines and home-confinement for the untreated aren't even controversial

29% want to take away the children of the untreated

While many voters have become skeptical toward the federal government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a majority of Democrats embrace restrictive policies, including punitive measures against those who haven’t gotten the COVID-19 vaccine.

A new Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 48% of voters favor President Joe Biden’s plan to impose a COVID-19 vaccine mandate on the employees of large companies and government agencies. That includes 33% who Strongly Favor the mandate. Forty-eight percent (48%) are opposed to Biden’s vaccine mandate, including 40% who Strongly Oppose the mandate. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Voters are similarly divided over the federal government’s top COVID-19 expert, Dr. Anthony Fauci. Forty-five percent (45%) view Fauci favorably, including 28% who have a Very Favorable impression of him. Forty-eight percent (48%) have an unfavorable impression of Fauci, including 34% who have a Very Unfavorable view of him.

The even split among voters is the result of deep partisan divisions. While 78% of Democratic voters support the Biden administration’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate plan, only 22% of Republicans and 41% of voters not affiliated with either major party support the vaccine mandate. And many Democrats would support even harsher measures, including fines for Americans who won’t get the COVID-19 vaccine and criminal punishment for vaccine critics.

The survey of 1,016 U.S. Likely Voters was conducted on January 5, 2022 by the Heartland Institute and Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

The survey found that 75% of likely Democratic voters – but only 21% of Republicans and 38% of unaffiliated voters – have a favorable opinion of Dr. Fauci. Among other findings of the survey:

– Fifty-eight percent (58%) of voters would oppose a proposal for federal or state governments to fine Americans who choose not to get a COVID-19 vaccine. However, 55% of Democratic voters would support such a proposal, compared to just 19% of Republicans and 25% of unaffiliated voters.

– Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Democratic voters would favor a government policy requiring that citizens remain confined to their homes at all times, except for emergencies, if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Such a proposal is opposed by 61% of all likely voters, including 79% of Republicans and 71% of unaffiliated voters.

– Nearly half (48%) of Democratic voters think federal and state governments should be able to fine or imprison individuals who publicly question the efficacy of the existing COVID-19 vaccines on social media, television, radio, or in online or digital publications. Only 27% of all voters – including just 14% of Republicans and 18% of unaffiliated voters – favor criminal punishment of vaccine critics.

– Forty-five percent (45%) of Democrats would favor governments requiring citizens to temporarily live in designated facilities or locations if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Such a policy would be opposed by a strong majority (71%) of all voters, with 78% of Republicans and 64% of unaffiliated voters saying they would Strongly Oppose putting the unvaccinated in “designated facilities.”

– While about two-thirds (66%) of likely voters would be against governments using digital devices to track unvaccinated people to ensure that they are quarantined or socially distancing from others, 47% of Democrats favor a government tracking program for those who won’t get the COVID-19 vaccine.

How far are Democrats willing to go in punishing the unvaccinated? Twenty-nine percent (29%) of Democratic voters would support temporarily removing parents’ custody of their children if parents refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine. That’s much more than twice the level of support in the rest of the electorate – seven percent (7%) of Republicans and 11% of unaffiliated voters – for such a policy.

The survey also found that more black voters (63%) than whites (45%), Hispanics (55%) or other minorities (32%) support Biden’s vaccine mandate for government workers and employees of large companies.

President Biden’s strongest supporters are most likely to endorse the harshest punishments against those who won’t get the COVID-19 vaccine. Among voters who have a Very Favorable impression of Biden, 51% are in favor of government putting the unvaccinated in “designated facilities,” and 54% favor imposing fines or prison sentences on vaccine critics. By contrast, among voters who have a Very Unfavorable view of Biden, 95% are against “designated facilities” for the unvaccinated and 93% are against criminal punishment for vaccine critics.

As the Omicron variant of COVID-19 produces a spike in cases nationwide, about three-quarters of Americans are already vaccinated against the coronavirus, and two-thirds of those have gotten booster shots.

Most Americans are concerned about new variants of the COVID-19 virus, but Democrats are more concerned than others, and place more trust in vaccines to protect against the disease.

Additional information from this survey and a full demographic breakdown are available to the public as well as Platinum Members.

Source: Rassmusen Reports

  1. Rebel Forever says

    Here’s a poll for ya: 100 percent of those who favor clot shot, death jab mandates can kiss my ass, Demonrat or Rethuglican.

    1. Margaret says

      Here are 7 at-home jobs that pay at least $100/day. And there’s quite the variety too! Some of these work-at-home jobs are more specialized, others are jobs that anyone can do. They all pay at least $3000/month, but some pay as much as $10,000.
      GO HOME PAGE FOR MORE DETAILS…………. http://Www.PAYCASH1.com

  2. Raptar Driver says

    I have said this before and I will make an amendment.
    The democratic party (& their supporters) have become a pure criminal enterprise and needs to be immediately disbanded rounded up and put on trial for crimes against humanity.

  3. ken says

    All polls are easily rigged… this poll being no different. I stopped relying on polls as most were just instruments of this or that ‘group’.

    And 1/2 of the democrats would boil down to less than 1/4 of the nation.

    That said,,, I know several democrats that refuse the shots so it goes without saying that many democrats disagree. On the other side their are republicans that are in complete agreement. All sides will do nothing to prevent the government from evil doings. Australia anyone?

    This pandemic is a pandemic of false positives,,, not a pandemic of covid.

    The PCR test cannot distinguish between “live” viruses and inactive (noninfectious) viral particles. This is why it cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. As explained by Dr. Lee Merritt in her August 2020 Doctors for Disaster Preparedness lecture, media and public health officials appear to have purposefully conflated “cases” or positive tests with the actual illness in order to create the appearance of a pandemic.

    Noooo,,, say it ain’t so!

    The PCR test cannot confirm that SARS-CoV-2 is the causative agent for clinical symptoms as the test cannot rule out diseases caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize for his work, explains this in the video above.

    Noooo,,, say it ain’t so!

    From the start, experts noted that a CT over 35 is scientifically unjustifiable, yet the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended running PCR tests at a CT of 40, and the World Health Organization recommended a CT of 45.

    Noooo,,, say it ain’t so!

    The PCR will pick up ‘dead’ viral debris along possible active material but cannot distinguish between the two and therefore CANNOT diagnose infection! The PCR can continue to light up on the dead debris for many weeks after the alleged infection which is why so many were incarcerated for a very long time.

    Obviously the test was weaponized and the whole shebang is the biggest scam in the history of Mankind.

    This is all known by everyone except, of course,the covidian cult that only listen to the Faucian science.

    With all the above said those that go to unvaxxed peoples homes in the US may want a SWAT team or military special forces team with them to prevent possible Pb poisoning.

  4. Meshuggah says

    What the poll reveals is that 50% of Democrats are jackbooted thugs just like the Nazi party or the Communist Chinese party.

  5. edwardi says

    As for who are the Demorats or the Repugnants, very close to 1/2 of eligible voters don’t vote, realizing the futility of which Mutt or Jeff party wins office. Of the 50% who do vote 40% of those consider themselves Independents since they also realize that neither party actually represents their best interests. That leaves 60% of the 50% who do vote as loyal to a party affiliate, although the combined voting public will still then add up to roughly 1/2 of eligible voters. So which ever party wins, they are supported by no more than 25-30 % of all eligible voters, less than 1/3 of the country then supports the sitting government at any given time. Worse yet, the government then enabled by the 33% legislates on behalf of only the top 10-20 % of the overall population per their class interests, though class interests do cross party lines and are always supported by that % who profits the most, and they call that ‘bi-partisan’ interests.

  6. Mr Reynard says

    Half of Democrats Support Deporting the mRNA-Untreated to ‘Designated Facilities’
    The Democrats mean there ?

    1. silver9blue says

      Trouble is this is not funny because it is how Nazi germany picked up its speed. Now its all vaccinated then it was all Germans and the rest on trains.

  7. Mark says

    Hey, remember the Danish Mask Study? Prestigious medical journals were happy to stipulate that it was the first-ever study to assess whether wearing facemasks helped to limit the spread of pandemic influenza, or of an airborne virus that spreads similarly to pandemic influenza, as most authorities have now grudgingly acknowledged coronavirus does. The trial used about 3000 subjects on each side, masked and unmasked, and the masks provided were the good ones, N-95’s, instead of those piece-of-shit blue cloth ones that wouldn’t keep a bluebird from flying into your mouth.

    The study found that the difference between infections of the two groups, masked and unmasked, was within the statistical margin of error, which customarily means there was a difference of less than 3% between the two. Really good masks like they are now trying to scam you into buying – at about 5 times the price – made no statistically meaningful difference in who got COVID and who did not.

    But the Danes could not get anyone to peer-review it. None of the big medical journals would touch it. It was finally printed by Annals of Internal Medicine, which is not even one of the major journals, and then only when the authors stipulated that they were not arguing against the ‘benefits’ of masking. The media went further, and print stories claimed the Danish study actually argued in favor of more masking.


    I mention that as background, because it has happened again. A Canadian study found that any benefit realized from ‘vaccination’ against COVID faded quickly, and that infection rates for the double-jabbed were actually higher, resulting in a ‘negative benefit’, which is another way of saying ‘increased risk’ without making it too scary.


    The study found that the booster shot offered only 37% protection against the Omicron variant and the mRNA two-shots vaccination actually resulted in negative protection; this is in line with results offered by Public Health Scotland, recently printed here. And what happened? Well, read it; an additional two weeks of data were added which ‘completely changed the results’, the bafflegab science-talk machine was spun up, and the lead author of the study sheepishly announced they had been completely wrong and would soon be releasing updated results which showed good protection from the vaccines.

    The narrative must not be challenged.

  8. Pablo says

    Yes Sir. And this is all happening in “The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave”!!! Amazing, isn’t it? You knew it was going to come to this as soon as The Patriot Act was passed. This kind of stuff has been in the works for some time now.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.