Finally Let in From the Cold, Sudan Reconsiders Russian Naval Base

Understandable, doesn't want to paint a giant target for the Empire on its back

Sudan’s interim government is having second thoughts about a deal that would allow Russia to establish a naval base on the Red Sea.

The deal is now under review to ensure it “serve[s] Sudan’s interests,” Sudanese officials informed a Russian delegation to Khartoum last week, said armed forces Chief of Staff Gen. Mohamed Othman al-Hussein in an interview with Sudan’s Blue Nile TV last night.

The deal, released by Moscow late last year, would allow Russia’s navy to maintain a 25-year lease at Port Sudan, housing up to four ships and 300 soldiers, in exchange for weapons and military equipment for Khartoum.

Russia claims the planned base would be for basic resupply and repairs, but the agreement also allows Russia to move “any weapons, ammunition and equipment” necessary through the port.

Sudan’s ousted dictator Omar al-Bashir initially discussed the agreement with Russian President Vladimir Putin in 2017.

“At the moment, we are negotiating a possible review of this agreement to ensure that our interests and our profits are taken into account,” Hussein said. “Some of the document’s provisions entail certain harm for Sudan.”

“This deal was signed under the former National Salvation Government,” he said, noting it was not approved by the Sudanese legislature “as required by the procedures for international treaties.”

Hussein did not rule out fulfillment of the agreement, saying it may yet be deemed valid if in line with the current Sudanese government’s interests.

“If the agreement achieves gains for us and meets Russia’s interests, there’s no problem,” he said.

“We seek advantages for ourselves in implementing this deal.”

Hussein also said recent US sanctions relief has opened Sudan to possible military cooperation with the United States, but he denied any connection to the review of the Port Sudan agreement.

US officials have eyed the Russian agreement warily. In April, the head of all US forces in Africa, Gen. Stephen Townsend, named the planned Russian base among his main strategic concerns on the continent, along with Russia’s foothold in Libya and China’s base in Djibouti.

Sudanese military officials are seeking closer ties with Washington, though some avenues remain blocked under US regulations.

Townsend has touted a policy of offering US counterterrorism support and training to governments in Africa to draw them closer into Washington’s orbit amid strategic competition with Russia and China.

Source: Al-Monitor

6 Comments
  1. Eddy says

    Some idiots prefer to IGNORE the lessons of history. No where, the has military bases, do the citizens of those countries, live in peace. Even Australia, is required to kowtow to the U.S. demands and involve it’self in the ILLEGAL and CRIMINAL actions of the U.S. Clearly, looks like Sudan can’t wait to do the same.

    1. Eddy says

      I left out the U.S. before the military bases. Maybe an EDIT option could be added to this facility ?

      1. Josep says

        On the bottom-right corner of a newly-posted comment is a gear icon. Click on it, find the ‘Edit’ option and for a short while you’ll have the chance to edit it as you please.

  2. Nevesky says

    Sudan will regret becoming involved with the US. The US will soon be balkanized so any US agreement will be worthless.

  3. yuri says

    excellent contribution to collapse of empire—amerikans must spend more money to bribe despot they installed in Sudan

  4. Romeo Leblanc says

    Sudan must be leery of the USA as they will regret dealing with the TERRORIST acts of the USA, they need to deal with Russia, China and others that don’t want to take over their country and resources.

Reply To Eddy
Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Anti-Empire