Fauci Says 99.2% of COVID Deaths Are Unvaccinated but Is Looking to Inject Children as Young as 6 Months
A vaccine this good wouldn't need herd immunity
Fauci says that 99.2% of those who die of COVID in the US are now unvaccinated.
Fauci, the country’s top public health official, has said that in June, 99.2% of Covid deaths in the US could be attributed to those who are unvaccinated.
For every one person who dies from the vaccinated population, 124 died from the pool of the unvaccinated. That’s quite something. Factoring in that the vaccinated pool is slightly larger and of a higher average age the unvaccinated are something like 150-200 times more likely to die of COVID than their vaccinated age peers.
That would imply the vaccine is working beyond the wildest claims of the manufacturers.* The makers based on the early trials only claimed a 90-95% effectiveness (a reduction of 10 to 20 times compared to the unvaccinated), but these figures would suggest an effectiveness better by an order of magnitude, reaching over 99.2%. (Going from 5-10% who do not benefit to less than 0.8%.)
So great then. Since the vaccine is according to Fauci so incredibly effective at saving those at-risk, they literally don’t have to do anything except take Fauci’s miracle injection. An 80-year old male if infected normally has a 95% chance of surviving. With a 99%-effective vaccine that goes up to a fantastic 99.95%. So all that stuff about “your vaccine protects me and my vaccine protects you” and needing to reach an 80% vaccination rate for “herd immunity” purposes goes out the window. 48% of Americans were still unvaccinated in June, yet vaccinated Americans barely died according to Fauci. Millions going unvaccinated does not cause the vaccinated to die. If the 99.2% is correct then that is what that means.
So of course Fauci will now drop his mantra that everyone should get injected for the purpose of herd immunity, right? That is, that even if they themselves are not at risk, they should still get injected for the sake of the at-risk. Eg, children as young as 6 months ought to be injected to build “herd immunity” to protect the elderly (despite children transmitting to adults being almost unheard of):
Dr. Anthony Fauci is “cautiously optimistic” that children younger than 12 will be eligible to get a COVID-19 vaccine by Thanksgiving, he said on CNN’s New Day on Thursday.
“We are now doing studies that are ongoing as we’re speaking, studies that are looking at what we call age de-escalation, children from 12 to 9 and then 9 to 6 and then 6 to 2 and then 6 months to 2 years,” Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told CNN’s John Berman.
What is even more insane about this is that it is becoming clear that vaccines do not prevent infection, so their usefulness for building up “herd immunity” (as opposed to stawing off death if Fauci’s figure is true) is questionable. (Theoretically, they could be making the vaccinated less infectious without preventing their infection but there is no proof of that.) In Israel the vaccinated and the unvaccinated populations are contributing to infection counts in exact proportion to their size:
Israel new data… pic.twitter.com/UbFjDZX5NB
— AG (@subwave) July 12, 2021
Injecting children with a novel concoction that they themselves do not need in order to protect seniors is beyond repugnant. A mark of a sick society.
Injecting children with a novel concoction that they themselves do not need in order to protect seniors who are already sufficiently protected with a vaccine with a claimed 99.2% effectiveness is even slightly more repugnant.
And injecting children with an experimental concoction they do not need in order to “protect” seniors who are already sufficiently protected by their vaccines, by building herd immunity that the concoctions are potentially incapable of contributing to is even slightly more repugnant than that.
It is funny how the same vaccine can at the same time be so effective as to make the at-risk recipient practically immortal for COVID purposes, yet so ineffective and crappy that the rest of us still have to take it just for “herd immunity” purposes — whatever gets the most to inject that is always the argument. But wait, why do the immortal need herd immunity?? And why should children be risked for the immortal?
Vaccine fanatics’ arguments crumble even against their other vaccine fanatic claims.
*Of course, the vaccine working ten times better than even the manufacturers expected could be an indication there is something fishy about Fauci’s numbers… (Would a doctor marking a vaccinated patient as having died of COVID be inviting less scrutiny, or more?)