Fauci Himself Admits Covid PCR Test at Over 35 Cycles Is Deceitful, Worse Than Useless

"It's just dead nucleoids, period.”

OK, here we go. Smoking gun. Jackpot.

Right from the horse’s mouth. Right from the man we’re told is the number-one COVID expert in the nation. What Fauci says is golden truth.

Well, how about THIS?

July 16, 2020, podcast, “This Week in Virology”: Tony Fauci makes a point of saying the PCR COVID test is useless and misleading when the test is run at “35 cycles or higher.” A positive result, indicating infection, cannot be accepted or believed.

Here, in techno-speak, is an excerpt from Fauci’s key quote (starting at about the 4-minute mark [1]):

“…If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-competent are miniscule…you almost never can culture virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…it’s just dead nucleoids, period.”

Each “cycle” of the test is a quantum leap in amplification and magnification of the test specimen taken from the patient.

Too many cycles, and the test will turn up all sorts of irrelevant material that will be wrongly interpreted as relevant.

That’s called a false positive.

What Fauci failed to say on the video is: the FDA, which authorizes the test for public use, recommends the test should be run up to 40 cycles. Not 35.

Therefore, all labs in the US that follow the FDA guideline are knowingly or unknowingly participating in fraud. Fraud on a monstrous level, because…

Millions of Americans are being told they are infected with the virus on the basis of a false positive result, and…

The total number of COVID cases in America—which is based on the test—is a gross falsity.

The lockdowns and other restraining measures are based on these fraudulent case numbers.

Let me back up and run that by you again. Fauci says the test is useless when it’s run at 35 cycles or higher. The FDA says run the test up to 40 cycles, in order to determine whether the virus is there. This is the crime in a nutshell.

If anyone in the White House has a few brain cells to rub together, pick up a giant bullhorn and start revealing the truth to the American people.

“Hello, America, you’ve been tricked, lied to, conned, and taken for a devastating ride. On the basis of fake science, the country was locked down.”

If anyone in the Congress has a few brain cells operating, pull Fauci into a televised hearing and, in ten minutes, make mincemeat out of the fake science that has driven this whole foul, stench-ridden assault on the US economy and its citizens.

All right, here are two chunks of evidence for what I’ve written above. First, we have a CDC quote on the FDA website, in a document titled: “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel For Emergency Use Only.” See page 35. This document is marked, “Effective: 07/13/20.” That means, even though the virus is being referred to by its older name, the document is still relevant as of July 2020. “For Emergency Use Only” refers to the fact that the FDA has certified the PCR test under a traditional category called “Emergency Use Authorization.”

FDA: “…a specimen is considered positive for 2019-nCoV [virus] if all 2019-nCoV marker (N1, N2) cycle threshold growth curves cross the threshold line within 40.00 cycles (< 40.00 Ct).”

Naturally, MANY testing labs reading this guideline would conclude, “Well, to see if the virus is there in a patient, we should run the test all the way to 40 cycles. That’s the official advice.”

Then we have a New York Times article (August 29/updated September 17) headlined: “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.” Here are money quotes:

“Most tests set the limit at 40 [cycles]. A few at 37.”

“Set the limit” would usually mean, “We’re going to look all the way to 40 cycles, to see if the virus is there.”

The Times: “This number of amplification cycles needed to find the virus, called the cycle threshold, is never included in the results sent to doctors and coronavirus patients…”

Boom. That’s the capper, the grand finale. Labs don’t or won’t reveal their collusion in this crime.

Get the picture?

I hope so.

If a lawyer won’t go to court with all this, or if a judge won’t pay attention and see the light, they should be stripped of their jobs and sent to the Arctic to sell snow.

Source: Jon Rappoport’s Blog

  1. Tim says

    How does anti-empire.com even remotely conceive of itself as having the basic fundamental knowledge to claim “fraud” in this case? Is anti-empire.com a known source of epidemiology and virology to such an extent that this article is incontestable in those respective fields? Or is this article based on paranoia and baseless conspiracy theories? Please explain.

    1. Ray Habenicht says

      So verbiose, yet nothing of substance. You have a vocabulary. Read the sources yourself. You seem to ‘trust Fauci’ – maybe even just listen to his own explanation? Or is this comment based on your own bias and ignorance? Please explain.

    2. Janna Morrell says
    3. Simeon Cryer says

      And yet Tim relies on the information spoon fed to him by Bill Gates. Laughable.

    4. Unnamed patriot says

      It’s based on Fauci’s actual words out of his own mouth…….That is what makes it just as credible if big bird was the source…..

  2. Montre Bible says

    They won’t admit anything until they’ve cattled enough people for their new vaccines. then it will be a “quiet science report”

    1. slight says


  3. Debra Ann Waldon-Myers says

    Texas University Reports on COVID test. Important notes: • The Antibody Assay for SARS-CoV-2 is not a diagnostic test to determine if COVID-19 virus is present. That diagnosis should be based on a PCR (molecular) test.
    • A negative test result with the Antibody Assay for SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies does not rule out a SARS-CoV-2 infection. Patients tested early in the infection may have a negative result, and not all patients will develop a detectable antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection.
    • A positive result for the SARS-CoV-2 antibody is indicative of an acute or recent infection. A positive result may also be due to past or present infection with non-SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus strains, such as coronavirus hKU1, NL63, OC43 or 229E that cause a mild illness like the common cold.

    1. Molli says

      Yes, true!
      Let’s not leave out the next phase or I should say, current phase; the vax.
      This mRNA experimental vaccine tricks the body into thinking it has Covid thus, creating antibodies.
      Once antibodies exist, all the vaccinated will test positive, healthy people will test positive at the FDA’s 40 cycles if they even had a whiff of a cold. Then of course, those who actually have Covid will test positive.
      Most won’t know this info & the msm will continue the circus of fear & control.
      Tyranny continues.

      1. perry says

        the body doesn’t create antibodies but rather pieces of the viral protein so the body will manifest an immune response that doesn’t rely on antibodies, hence the name mRNA vaccine. This is far worse on many levels to the old school vaccines that did illicit an antibody response. All they can say, with evidence, is that you probably won’t get as sick if you are vaccinated. There isn’t even evidence for a decreased likelihood you will infect someone else if you do get exposed. I find it appalling they are so successful in getting the general public convinced of this debacle when there are so many contradictions on the face of it. To regress i think fauci was a large rat in his past life.

        1. slight says

          lol false sorry science is hard for you

  4. Richard Wahd says

    36 years and $565 billion dollars later and Fauci still can’t deliver on an AIDS vaccine which he promised… Yet he’s entrusted to deliver on “Kelloggs Covid Nineteen”?? I trust him as far as he can throw a baseball

    1. Tim says

      If you did any research you would have found this out for yourself. Fauci this Fauci that…..why are you all so busy scapegoating this dude?

      “One of the reasons why it has been so difficult to make an AIDS vaccine is that the virus infects the very cells of the immune system that any vaccine is supposed to induce,” senior author Dr. Guido Silvestri, chief of microbiology and immunology at Yerkes National Primate Research Center.

      Seems like a simple reason to me. AIDS is fucked up. Not Fauci.

      1. Ray Habenicht says

        ‘Scapegoating’? He lies about something everytime he opens his mouth. You should take your own advice and do much more research. Start by looking up what the Nobel prize winning inventor of the PCR test said about Fauci regarding the whole HIV lie. Hint: it wasn’t flattering. Fauci has been running the exact same con with ‘covid’ as he did with ‘HIV/AIDS.’

        “Good work if you can get it” I guess. Fauci is a nothing but a fraud – an overpaid (highest in the nation!) useless lifelong bureaucrat.

        1. slight says

          lol hows it feel to be uneducated?

          1. Zizblats Diamond says

            not an argument

      2. perry says

        the issue is no less complicated when it comes to a cold vaccine versus aids but he claims to know what there is no evidence for and has contradicted himself par with fox news. A pandemic was not declared for a virus with a 99+% survival rate, world economic crises and social consequences that have yet to be evaluated, ever. Just a coincidence that the people orchestrating this power grab are getting richer at a rate never seen before? Intentionally using a test that was not suited for the situation with parameters that knowingly make it scientifically invalid is not reason for you to think critically?

  5. Saint Jimmy (Russian American) says

    So transparent…

    On Monday, Pfizer shares soared 16% following a bullish statement on the company’s experimental COVID-19 vaccine showed 90% effectiveness in preliminary results. Then on Tuesday, according to a Securities and Exchange Commission filing, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla sold 62% of his stock.


    I really want the opportunity to slowly roast some of these mother fuckers over a mesquite wood fire one day.

    1. Chuck says

      May I watch?

    2. Saint Jimmy (Russian American) says

      No reaction from posters here to our glorious free market capitalists openly shitting on our heads.

  6. Raptar Driver says

    Perhaps he is giving himself an out, knowing that there may be coming retribution for all this fakery.
    The excuse that I was following orders Is simply not a defense.

  7. Trevor Marr says

    Dr. Faustus is not here for our health!!!

    1. slight says

      lol awww durururuurur

  8. novo says

    in PCR, you put in your nucleic acids, primers, template, polymerase etc into a thermocycler, select a program (temps and number of cycles), and get the product at the end. you could take it and run a gel or use another measure to calculate how much product you got.
    in qPCR you put in FLUORESCENT NUCLEIC ACIDS, primers, template, polymerase, etc into a qPCR machine, and select the number of cycles. then the machine tells you the value of the fluorescence AFTER EVERY CYCLE. CT is the cycle number when the fluorescence is detected above a threshold. so you can set the machine for 1000000 cycles, but you will still be told if the fluoresce is detected after 10th cycle, or 20th. this corresponds to the amount of DNA material in the sample (after RT).
    did you lie on purpose, or are you too incompetent?

    1. Neville says

      That is not the issue being addressed here, though. The point made here is that, according to Dr. Fauci, Ct at 35 or above is so unreliable as to be useless. However, the FDA tells labs that they should run the test with Ct levels all the way up to 40 in order to look for virus. If the machine detects, or reports that it detects, virus at Ct 39 or 40 then that individual’s result is reported as “Positive”. Dr. Fauci says that particular result is meaningless. The recipient, or the employer, or the airline, etc. isn’t told that the result is meaningless unless the specific Ct value is requested after the test. How many people do you know of who follow up with the lab to ask that question?

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.