To back the site in non-USD currencies: EUR, CAD, AUD, GBP


42 of you are backing the new quarter with $993, thank you! 66 percent there.


Facebook Disallows Reporting of Official Israeli COVID Vaccine Data — Anti-Empire Hit

100% accurate, 100% banned

Post expunged and page rating downgraded permanently by “fact-checking” for reporting of cold, hard figures. It doesn’t get any more factual than straight reporting of data but there you go:

The article in question:

Israeli Data Shows Natural Immunity MASSIVELY More Protective Than Vaccination

Nearly 40% of new COVID patients were vaccinated — compared to just 1% who had been positive previously

It’s a reprint from Arutz Sheva, one of the biggest Israeli news portals (associated with the Zionist right).

The fact check claims this straightforward reporting of official data is “misleading” and “lacks content”. Anti-Empire has 1500 to 2000 other COVID-related articles. How is that for context? Does every single COVID-related article have to include every single bit of other COVID information?

What exactly is “misleading” about straight numbers? Actually, the fact check relies on straw-manning the article. It claims the article posits that natural immunity is “superior” which would be a matter of subjective judgment, but the only actual claim being made is that Israeli data indicates natural immunity is MORE PROTECTIVE against reinfection which is an indisputable fact. One is still perfectly free to pick the less protective option as “superior” on some different criteria or preference for less protection.

Misleading: Both infection and vaccination generate immunity. However, vaccines do so without exposing the person to the risks associated with the disease, and are thus a much safer way to acquire immunity.

LOL. Surely everyone with a functioning brain cell understands that acquiring natural immunity is associated with risk associated with natural infection, and acquiring vaccine protection is associated with risk associated with the vaccines. Whether such inane “information” is included or not is up to the editor, not a Facebook fact-checker who couldn’t make it as one.

Also, it’s hilarious how bitterly polemical this “fact check” is. The frustrated dweeb writing it actually writes “this comparison is meaningless” and that’s just in the summary. What is such language doing in a fact check, which one imagines ought to be dispassionate?

Lack of context: The claim that infection provides stronger immunity than vaccination is based on the proportion of infections among vaccinated and previously infected individuals. However, this comparison is meaningless because it doesn’t consider important factors, such as the severity of the disease or the lower total number of infections compared to pre-vaccination waves.

Not once is the accuracy of the reporting or of the figures disputed. Instead, the fact-checker argues against a subjective judgment with her own subjective argument that vaccine immunity is in fact the superior one. (Kind of like arguing whose dad can beat whose dad.) Except that unlike the fact-checker, the original article in question didn’t even cross over into realm of preference but just served up the numbers.

Oh yeah, but someone did tweet that natural immunity is “superior” and linked to this piece so I guess it’s okay to expunge the report that merely shared the data — and to hit anyone else who may have reprinted it. Hilarious stuff.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Jerry Hood
Jerry Hood
1 month ago

God ” chosen” khazars should be immune to any viruses!

Jerry Hood
Jerry Hood
1 month ago
Reply to  Jerry Hood

Don’t they claim to have a special genes and blood???

XSFRGR
XSFRGR
1 month ago
Reply to  Jerry Hood

YES, THEY DO !! LOOK UP “COHANIM MARKER”.

Ultrafart the Brave
Ultrafart the Brave
1 month ago

Serious question – given that Facebook is the Social Media incarnation of a giant parasitic yet insidiously tyrannical turd, and that alternatives are freely available, why is anyone still even using Facebook? Same question applies to YouTube.

Parler, Gab, Rumble, Bitchute and Patreon come immediately to mind.

Even Russian and Chinese alternatives are freely available for the adventurous. Couldn’t be any worse than the fascist mindf#cks that are Facebook and YouTube.

ken
ken
1 month ago

Same reason most still want to force mask wearing. Because they’re blooming idiots!

IncenDiary
IncenDiary (@incendiary)
1 month ago

Everyone is still there and there’s still a few people there with minds left – best option if you’re gonna delete your account anyway is share as much truth as possible until banned to try lifeboat as many out before the collapse, otherwise I dunno we’re still stuck with the same problem where we’re the only ones on these alternative platforms forming our own kind of echo chamber, I suppose there is no avoiding the segregation of society they are pushing so hard for…

Last edited 1 month ago by IncenDiary
Peter Kerek
Peter Kerek
1 month ago
Reply to  IncenDiary

And don’t forget Rokfin – that’s where I first started hearing uncensored critiques from scientists like Dr. Robert Malone and Denis Rancourt. There’s a monthly subscription fee but it’s worth it – even if it’s just for the sake of supporting independent media.

ken
ken
1 month ago

So true gov data is no longer factual per the fact checkers. Thanks!

So that means all the data is…… a…..

steaming-pile.jpg
NGg
NGg
1 month ago

Zionist mafia runs the show

Anti-Empire