Europe Doesn’t Have the Freedom Not to Choose America’s “Freedom Gas”

"Freedom gas" is backed by sanctions threat

US Energy Dept likens “molecules of freedom” to liberating soldiers but Europe (like Iraq or Syria) doesn’t get a say in whether it wants this “liberation”

Related: US Department of Energy Is Now Referring to LNG as “Freedom Gas”

The US Department of Energy (DOE) recently renamed US liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports “freedom gas.” But freedom for who? For Europe which already has a cheap and reliable source of natural gas, but is being forced to switch over to more expensive US gas under the threat of sanctions? Certainly not.

Or freedom for Russia who supplies Europe with much of its natural gas to compete openly and fairly with the United States? Most definitely not.

Or is it freedom from competition for the US?  Yes, indeed.

It is often contradictory branding that heralds various chapters of US injustice at home (under the draconian “Patriot Act” for example) and abroad, such as during the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq carried out under the dubious name of “Operation Iraqi Freedom.”

Not the Onion

So discredited have US campaigns christened in the name of “freedom” become, that few scarcely believed the US was actually, seriously calling its natural gas exports “freedom gas.” However, it is not a headline torn from the pages of the satirical newspaper “The Onion,” but rather from the US DOE itself.

In an article from the DOE’s official website titled, “Department of Energy Authorizes Additional LNG Exports from Freeport LNG,” the DOE states (emphasis added):

“Increasing export capacity from the Freeport LNG project is critical to spreading freedom gas throughout the world by giving America’s allies a diverse and affordable source of clean energy. Further, more exports of U.S. LNG to the world means more U.S. jobs and more domestic economic growth and cleaner air here at home and around the globe,” said U.S. Under Secretary of Energy Mark W. Menezes, who highlighted the approval at the Clean Energy Ministerial in Vancouver, Canada. “There’s no doubt today’s announcement furthers this Administration’s commitment to promoting energy security and diversity worldwide.”

Aside from the almost comical reference to “freedom gas,” there is something else revealing about the DOE’s claims of  “giving America’s allies a diverse and affordable source of clean energy.”

This is in direct reference to Europe, and Europe’s current imports of Russian gas. Russian gas, delivered by pipelines to Europe will always be cheaper than US liquefied natural gas transported by sea to Europe. That is, unless the US, through the threat of sanctions not only against Russia, but against Washington’s own allies in Europe, can raise those costs to above the price of US exports.

Articles like Foreign Policy’s “U.S. Senate Threatens Sanctions Over Russian Pipeline,” make it clear just how far along the US is toward doing just that.

The article claims:

In the latest uptick of trans-Atlantic tensions, European ships involved in the construction of a controversial gas pipeline from Russia to Germany could be subject to U.S. sanctions under a new bipartisan bill that will be introduced in the U.S. Senate as early as Monday.

FP also claims:

The Trump administration has rebuked Germany for moving forward with the project, one of a raft of recent issues straining trans-Atlantic relations alongside Iran, climate change, and trade. Last July, U.S. President Donald Trump accused Berlin of being held “captive” to Russia due to its dependence on Moscow for energy, a charge German officials sharply dismissed.

Thus, Germany is not only being “rebuked” for making its own decisions regarding German economic and foreign policy, it is being threatened with US sanctions for not complying to US dictates. Calling LNG the US would seek to force nations like Germany to buy against their will “freedom gas” is an intentional insult added to economic injury Washington already seeks to inflict.

“Freedom Gas” a Smokescreen for Dictatorship  

Late last year, the US House of Representatives passed resolution 1035 – “Expressing opposition to the completion of Nord Stream II”

By passing this resolution, the United States presumed to dictate to all of Europe who they could and couldn’t do business with. And while the resolution was non-binding, it alluded to sanctions now already being put in motion.

It was clear that the resolution’s language regarding “European energy security through diversification of supplies” simply meant Washington would seek to force Europe to buy US gas over Russian gas.

The very idea of Washington passing resolutions focused on “European energy security” in the first place is a full frontal assault on European sovereignty and “freedom.” Now that the resolution’s intentions are being transformed into policy – including sanctions targeting European companies – it has become an economic attack on Europe as well.

Worse still is the fact that to make US gas exports competitive, the US must resort to more than just sanctions. It must also commit to multiple conflicts hindering the delivery of Russian gas – such as in Ukraine where for 5 years now armed conflict has raged, threatening pipelines delivering Russian gas to Europe.

The US portrays Russia as a threat to European security and stability – despite the fact that Europe itself has voluntarily and jointly developed the infrastructure to bring Russian gas into Europe and jointly benefits from these imports. The US thus finds itself pushing childish gimmicks like “freedom gas” as a smokescreen for the fact that Washington – not Moscow – poses the greatest threat to European security, stability, and even prosperity.

Washington’s methods of targeting Russian hydrocarbons, or Chinese telecom technology, has revealed the US as an unreliable ally, an unreliable business partner, and lacking the means to compete in a free and fair global market. Its tactics of coercion over competition – if successful – will leave the world with inferior alternatives forced onto nations at extorted prices.

The world faces a choice between “freedom gas” and actual freedom to decide what it buys and from whom it buys it from – one of the most basic freedoms of all and a freedom Washington seeks to deny the world.

Source: 21st Century Wire



You may back the site at:




Subscribe
Notify of
guest
15 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

thomas malthaus
thomas malthaus
24 days ago

Some danger exists that sanctions or the Nordstream II work remains incomplete when the financial crisis hits.

Canosin
Canosin
24 days ago

you may be right….. however, the damage would be bigger for Europe. … and for the US too… . because if this happens, Europe would disintegrate faster…. even the dullest of the ignorants would by then understand what freedom gas means

Séamus Ó Néill
Séamus Ó Néill
24 days ago

Patronising morons….”Freedom Gas” indeed ! The “empire” is dying , but more quickly than could have been imagined. Sanctions have invigorated Russia, now world leader in non GMO crops and its economy is booming. Sanctions against China are devastating America’s farmers …record numbers going bankrupt and have welded China and Russia together and ensured de-dollarisation, aircraft carriers that can’t launch planes , planes that don’t fly and the whole infrastructure in America is crumbling to dust….they’ve become the laughing stock of the world !

Lloyd Cross
Lloyd Cross
24 days ago

Not Unlike the Mafia Mobs in the 40s and 50s of New York, Give us the Money or we will Smash your Store up. This Seems to be the Foreign Policy of the US to the World Now.???

Mary E
24 days ago
Reply to  Lloyd Cross

Certainly, it is!

JustPassingThrough
JustPassingThrough
24 days ago

“freedom gas” issues from the collective anal orifices of the u.s. doe.

there is nothing of value in this piece. no new news just fear-mongering.
Fast-Forward

cartolucci: (not very flattering sites)

https://uprootedpalestinians.blogspot.com/2012/03/tony-cartaluccis-covering-for-israel.html
https://tony-cartalucci-is-a-moron.blogspot.com/

Mary E
24 days ago

Well, let’s look at it this way: it informs people who were not aware of the evils of the DOE…

JustPassingThrough
JustPassingThrough
24 days ago
Reply to  Mary E

duckduckgo: “freedom gas”

thomas malthaus
thomas malthaus
24 days ago

Unless Germany has already started so, it’s not to late to begin de-dollarization.

pooi-hoong chan
pooi-hoong chan
24 days ago

Germany, should join Russia, China, Iran and the BRIC countries to dedollarise.

Mary E
24 days ago

They will….they have to!

Canosin
Canosin
24 days ago

Germany is f*ucked up. … total submission to the empire…. sold by Merkel…. traitor and destroyer of Germany

Carlwilliam
Carlwilliam
24 days ago
Reply to  Canosin

Merdekel, Schulz, Juncker, Verhofstadt should all be arrested as traitors to their countries. A life sentence would be too lenient. Let them clean bathrooms at refugee centers. When they die do not give them a funeral. Just throw their corpses in a ditch (Waldgrube) as food for stray dogs and rats. The meat might even kill the poor rats.

Mary E
24 days ago

Hard to fathom! The US is desperately trying to crown itself KING of the world and dominate politics economies through military and economic wars…In a case like the almost comical (if it weren’t so hellish) Freedom Gas plan, the US is showing its total lack of competitive ability to the rest of the world as it sinks below any level of prosperity.
Europe should be able to just turn its back on the insane US engineers of evil and continue to go ahead with the plan already in place for Nordstream II and go to Nordstream III and IV if they should..it just is not Washington’s business – they have enough to do in the States to right their economic ship which is listing badly…

Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!