Being Overweight Is a Public Health Epidemic, So Why Is It That We Don’t Restrict the Freedoms of the Obese?

Good question. Also don't give them ideas

“To understand the dangers of Covid passports, simply imagine an obesity equivalent”

The Government should not let its drive for health certification stall at Covid-19 passports. If it is serious about saving lives and promoting personal responsibility then it must target the avoidable and identifiable disease of obesity.

It’s an absurd idea, of course. Yet as a thought experiment, it perfectly illustrates the dangers of handing such powers over to government.

In the same way that we can now test for Covid, we have long had the medical know-how to spot obesity. We use the body mass index (BMI) to identify people of a healthy weight. Those with a BMI above 25 are deemed to be overweight, those with one over 30 are classed as obese.

And obesity is no laughing matter. The British Medical Journal recently carried research conducted in the United States which suggests that a BMI of 30 or more increases the risk of Covid-19 hospitalisation by 113 per cent, admission to intensive care by 74 per cent and death by 48 per cent. Public Health England has reported that your risk of dying from Covid-19 increases by 90 per cent if you have a BMI of over 40. It is an inescapable fact that a great many hospital beds, doctors and NHS resources have been absorbed over the past year by the clinically obese.

The Government’s own research shows that 63 per cent of adults in England are overweight and 27 per cent of all adults are obese, with a BMI above 30. The cost of this fat epidemic to the NHS and wider economy is put at £27 billion a year. How many lives could be saved and improved with this £27 billion? It is clear that by sucking resource away from deserving illnesses and social causes, the obese kill those of a healthy weight.

But at last change might be possible. In the same way that people will soon have to prove their Covid status, we could also be at the stage where technology could be deployed to monitor people’s obesity status. Such a breakthrough would finally allow the state to restrict the overweight’s access to certain dining facilities and high-calorie foods.

Think of it. Upon entering a restaurant, the business could scan a mobile phone app that showed your BMI. Those within the healthy range could order what they wished off the menu, while the overweight could be restricted to ordering size-limited portions. As for the obese, they could be asked to settle for a salad or simply invited to leave. For takeaway orders, companies such as Just Eat or Deliveroo could use the same data, taken over the telephone, to weed out the obese from placing a fast-food order. In supermarkets, your BMI status could be scanned at checkout, with fatter customers having certain foods removed from their baskets or replaced with healthier options.

People’s weight does change and restrictions on accessing high calorie food may cause some to want to lose weight. Any fluctuations in your body mass could be captured monthly at NHS weigh-in stations, with your new weight and BMI immediately uploaded on to your smartphone.

At all times it has to be remembered this scheme is voluntary. There will be no requirement to carry a BMI certificate, but the Government should make clear that any restaurateur or fast-food chain must assume that a person not in possession of such a certificate is obese and therefore should not be served.

It is absolutely the case that being overweight and obese is a choice, but it is only right that choices carry consequences. Why should those 37 per cent of us adults who aren’t fat have to put up with the selfish conduct of the wilfully heavy. No, fat people have had it easy for too long. Removing them from fast-food chains, restaurants and the snack aisles of supermarkets will be both good for them and good for us. Clamping down on the voluntarily obese will free up money, beds and resources in the NHS. Quite frankly, it will save lives.

Of course I don’t believe in taking any of the above actions – in fact, even suggesting them makes me feel ill. But I can certainly make a reasonable argument for them, in the same way that many people are making the argument for vaccine passports. Please, given what is at stake in the complex relationship between citizen and Government, let us all tread cautiously and be careful what we wish for.

Sir Charles Walker is Conservative MP for Broxbourne

Source: The Telegraph

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Cap
Cap
17 days ago

In the US yanks think fat is beautiful…that’s why they are free to walk around and keep on shoveling food down their throats. It’s good bizz!

Last edited 17 days ago by Cap
Juan
Juan
17 days ago
Reply to  Cap

Eating fat is good. Being fat (by way of eating sugars and starch) is not.

Cap
Cap
16 days ago
Reply to  Juan

Tell that to those fat asses not me…

ken
ken
17 days ago

I suggest a study on the number of fat / obese in government. There is where your answer to your question lies.

Your putting my heatlh at risk.png
Miles
Miles
17 days ago

There’s money in obesity, profit from highly processed food, profit from the disease caused, profit from gizmos and diets… Only downside is death. No money in dead people that’s way science must find a way to keep people alive and yet dead at the sane time. Go science we know you can do it 👍💉

yuri
yuri
17 days ago

in amerika–the only known oral culture on earth—1st stage of development in Freud’s 5 stages, we observe a nation of fragile insecure under socialized children with bad manners. if an amerikan isn’t speaking about money it will be food. In America a defective product is a lemon, profit gravy. and of course only Americans address their lovers using food terms: honey, sugar, buttercup, dumpling, cupcake

Kieran DSouza
17 days ago

such a sensible decision as monitoring obesity would immediately produce tangible results and result in a trimmer healthier population with better eating habits and introduction of better foods into the market like organic fruit and veggies, greens, nuts, dry fruits and the like. But this would threaten to a great degree the profits of food industry and pharma industry if diabetes, heart disease, and other fat related illnesses are sent packing. So the food and pharma lobbyists will not allow such a decision as obesity monitoring to ever take place, not if they can help it.

Anti-Empire