To back the site in non-USD currencies: EUR, CAD, AUD, GBP


43 of you are backing the new quarter with $1008, thank you! 67 percent there.


BBC Explains We’re Having a Total Shutdown So 80-Year Olds Can Still Die Just Not With Coronavirus

What a great reason to carpet bomb the tax base that sustains the health care system everyone depends on, including the elderly

BBC:

Imperial College London modelling, used to inform government, has suggested 500,000 could have died by August in the UK if the virus was left to rip through the population.

It also warned the government’s previous strategy to slow the spread by asking those with symptoms to self-isolate and shield the most vulnerable could have led to 250,000 deaths.

Now, it is hoped the lockdown will limit deaths to 20,000.

But that does not mean 480,000 lives are being saved – many will die whether or not they get the virus.

Every year, about 600,000 people in the UK die. And the frail and elderly are most at risk, just as they are if they have coronavirus.

Nearly 10% of people aged over 80 will die in the next year, Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter, at the University of Cambridge, points out, and the risk of them dying if infected with coronavirus is almost exactly the same.

There you go. The total shutdown doesn’t mean we’re saving frail people. Even in their own model it just means the great majority will still die, they just won’t die with covid-19.

So this is worth:

a.) Forcing the elderly to live out the last months of their lives as prisoners.

b.) Depleting our economy and tax base which down the line is going to cost somebody his much-needed chemotherapy.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

ourblue
ourblue
8 months ago

For people like me, that needs to remove shoes and socks in order to count to twenty this link is worth a look. https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/04/04/coronavirus-facts-over-fear-us-uk-govt-experts-exaggerated-deaths-by-131-times/

ke4ram
ke4ram
8 months ago

Once (if) they release us from house arrest they will tell us how many millions they saved. Think they will keep up with the suicides, the starving, of those they put out of work who lost their homes and everything else. Don’t count on it!

itchyvet
itchyvet
8 months ago
Reply to  ke4ram

Question, If they release us from our homes, that does not mean the virus has disapeared, it is STILL THERE. All it would mean the infection has been starved of victims. So what’s the point of releasing us even then, just to get re-infected ???????? How is that going to solve anything ??????????

ke4ram
ke4ram
8 months ago
Reply to  itchyvet

Assuming there is a virus,,,you may be correct. I’m of the thought this is like the Swine flu bs back in 2009 they tried and tried and tried but failed to get the fear going. There is a CBS journalist that got fired for leaking that. The CDC actually quit counting because no one was coming down with the Swine or any other type of flu. As soon as they achieve their goals (whatever that is) then this will disappear like the Swine, Ebola and others did.

They may revive it later to facilitate more of their goals but more likely they’ll just come up with another virus,,, this time even more dastardly then Covid (according to them).

The vaccine seems to be the highest priority along with a digital chip imbedded in your arm to show you got the shot. If this is a Malthusian agenda to reduce the population the shot may be the culprit that kills millions but they will insist (and people will agree, like today) that it is another deadly virus. See how easy it can be to cull out much of the population. And better yet,,, they’ll have the backing of the people that believe them.

They may be psychopaths but they’re smart psychopaths.

mijj
mijj
8 months ago

old people will die sooner or later. May as well have them die sooner.

Grant Laird
Grant Laird
8 months ago
Reply to  mijj

Young people will die sooner or later too..
Just a little bit later.
So why not just kill them all when they reach a certain age.? Since you are so Compassionate why don’t (you choose the age?

mijj
mijj
8 months ago
Reply to  Grant Laird

i was being sarcastic. I should have added “/snark” to make it obvious

ke4ram
ke4ram
8 months ago
Reply to  Grant Laird

Suggest the the movie ‘In Time’

itchyvet
itchyvet
8 months ago
Reply to  mijj

Problem, sooner or later, you too will be “old”.

Emmet Sweeney
Emmet Sweeney
8 months ago

Succintly put. This is the most unhinged episode of human history: An economic and human catastrophe conjured out of nothing by a malevolent media and a few corrupt medical practitioners.

Anti-Empire