Austria Preparing Bill to Fine the Injection-Free and the Unboosted Ages 14 and Above €600 Every Three Months

Up to a total of €3600 after which, what? Bill would require three non-voluntary doses

Editor’s note: Interesting that they’re going after the unboosted right away. The smart play would have been to first target only the injection-free, then expand.


Austria’s planned vaccine mandate law will take a step towards becoming reality this week, and will reportedly apply from the age of 14, with fines of €600 which can be issued multiple times.

Several of Austria’s major national newspapers including the Kurier, Die Presse, Heute and Der Standard claimed to have seen a copy of the draft law, though the Ministry of Health declined to comment on it when asked by broadcaster ORF, saying an official first draft will be submitted later this week.

According to the media reports, the law will come into effect on February 1st but fines will not be issued until March 15th, allowing people the chance to get vaccinated after the law becomes reality. The government has however repeatedly urged Austrian residents not to wait until the mandate to get their jab. Reminder letters inviting people to vaccination would be sent by the Ministry of Health in February; similar letters have already been sent out by social insurance agencies.

The law would require three doses: the second between 14 and 42 days after the first, and a third between 120 and 270 days after the second. The Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Johnson & Johnson vaccines would be recognised.

The Local has contacted the Ministry of Health for further information, including what would apply to people who were vaccinated with jabs not approved in Austria, for example those who received the Sputnik vaccine abroad..

The mandate would apply from the age of 14 (vaccination is currently available for children in Austria from the age of five), but people who cannot get vaccinated for medical reasons would be excluded, as they have been from 2G requirements. Pregnant people would also be excluded from the mandate, as would those who had recently recovered from a Covid-19 infection, although only for 180 days following the infection.

For people who were previously covered by an exemption, the mandate would apply from the end of the month after the exemption ceasing to apply. This would be the case for teenagers after their 14th birthday, people after the birth of their child, and people who had a recovery certificate, for examples.

Reports say the fines for violating the mandate would be set at €600, which could be issued every three months up to an annual total of €2,400. The fine for refusing to pay the penalty would be set at a maximum of €3,600 — though the draft reportedly includes a clause to say that personal financial circumstances should be taken into account when setting the fine. This money would be used to fund hospitals.

As of December 4th, 71.7 percent of the total Austrian population had received at least one dose of a Covid-19 vaccine.

The mandate has sparked major protests across the country over recent weeks, with five arrests made when a small minority of over 40,000 protestors in Vienna clashed with police last weekend.

Source: The Local

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
8 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Martillo
Martillo
1 month ago

Because Austria spawned the 2 most evil fascists of the 20th century (Onkel Adolf and the “aristocratic”mutt “Count Richard von Coudenhove Kalergi) it should come as no surprise that the Rothschild owned sewer is still pumping effluent into continental Urupp. Lest these compromised gender confused retards Austrians call their “politicians” have forgotten, not to mention the political filth in most every other country, the Nuremberg Code is set in concrete and will be applied when the current democide is stopped, and make no doubt stopped it will be.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/JAu0KMztzbKY/

This Pivotal Moment - Episode 1


https://www.bitchute.com/video/JAu0KMztzbKY/

The Nuremberg Code (1947)

Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
  2. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.
  3. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.
  4. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results justify the performance of the experiment.
  5. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  6. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
  7. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  8. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability or death.
  9. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
  10. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
  11. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

For more information see Nuremberg Doctor’s Trial, BMJ 1996;313(7070):1445-75.

Jerry Hood
Jerry Hood
1 month ago
Reply to  Martillo

These zionazi pigs knows, there shall e no another Nürnberg Trials, because we all face the end times! All the zionists, freemasons and talmudists knows it, only here, dumbed down goyim are brain dead…

guest
guest (@guest)
1 month ago
Reply to  Martillo

And the “code” of a kangaroo-court means what ?
How detached from reality do you have to be to think that the grand-children of the organizers of the kangaroo court will now organize another kangaroo court and indict themselves.

edwardi
Noble Member
edwardi (@edwardi)
1 month ago
Reply to  guest

It is what should happen, nice to think that it could, and to see the law and logic of it laid out explicitly. India has taken the lead, the national Bar Association has filed two cases, most recently one for Murder against Bill Gates himself, and another against an official for the WHO for holding up Ivermectin use. There are several other organized suits in process, data is being leaked daily now, very incriminating data, Kennedy’s book about Fauci is selling well and the information there is utterly Damning, and Francis Boyle a well known lawyer activist is laying out strategies for state and country Prosecutors to file cases, sine the Federals are all criminals complicit.

edwardi
Noble Member
edwardi (@edwardi)
1 month ago
Reply to  Martillo

Great post.

Martillo
Martillo
1 month ago

Until stinky bacon is burned crispy the vertical robo swine slurping their swill at the globo trough will go on crushing skulls ad nauseam and defending the pedovore filth now running operation Global Hollow Co$t. Get off your knees sheeple and tear it all down already.

Mr Reynard
Mr Reynard
1 month ago

This is the picture of the man, that I would have put above in that article & NOT the one which is there ?
comment image
See those psycho’s eyes ?? IDOL of Antifa/BLM

ken
ken
1 month ago

Pregnant people? No such thing.

Woke fascist nazis. Who’d a thunk it.

Anti-Empire