Kremlin: Ukraine Is “Highly Likely” to Attack Donbass, Also Kremlin: Attack Would Have “Serious Consequences”

As US warns that a Russian escalation against Ukraine is imminent, Moscow insists it is Ukraine’s escalation against Donbass that is imminent:

MOSCOW, February 16. /TASS/. It is highly probable that Kiev will embark on a combat operation in Donbass, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Wednesday.

“We draw attention to this dangerous concentration and to the fact that a military operation and an attempt to resolve problems with the use of force in the southeast are quite real. This probability is high and real and, unfortunately, all of us and the entire world were witnesses when Kiev unleashed a military operation in Donbass, that is, it started a civil war in the country,” the Russian presidential spokesman said.

Of course, Moscow is on the record since November [when the Russian buildup was first publicized by the Americans] that such a Ukrainian escalation would come with “serious consequences” for Ukraine:

MOSCOW, November 21. /TASS/. Attempts to resolve the Ukrainian crisis by force will trigger serious consequences, Kremlin Spokesman Dmitry Peskov stated on Sunday.

“Ukraine is most likely seeking another attempt to start solving its own problem by force, creating another disaster for itself and for everyone in Europe,” the Kremlin spokesman told the Rossiya-1 TV channel.

According to Peskov, Ukraine “is achieving this, most likely, under the cover of those NATO exercises, NATO ships in the Black Sea, American and British soldiers in the region, there are more and more of them.”

“This is what Ukraine is striving for. And this is heartbreaking since it will entail some serious consequences,” Peskov insisted.

It is a theme Kremlin has played on consistently. In January it suggested NATO arms shipments were encouraging Ukraine to escalate in Donbass:

“The Ukrainian authorities are concentrating a huge amount of forces and means on the engagement line. Indeed, the nature of this concentration indicates preparation for offensive actions. Indeed, there is such a threat now. And, indeed, every single piece of weapon, be it defensive or offensive, just inspires hotheads in Kyiv to start this operation. We can’t help but worry about it,” he said.

Peskov stressed that the threat of “provocations” by Ukraine’s military now is higher than before and that Moscow would like the NATO countries in each new statement to urge the Ukrainian authorities not to even think about the possibility of a military settlement in Donbas.

Why Kiev would launch an offensive into Donbass just as Russia has 60% of its land army power standing at the ready in a ring around it is left unexplained. That would make as much sense as Assad “gassing his own people” after Obama’s chemical weapons “red line” threat.

Moscow is very much acting like it is either A) thirsty for an excuse to escalate against Kiev and quash it or B) pretending to be.

You could make the argument that Kremlin’s rhetoric is meant to deter Kiev, but I don’t buy it. Kiev was sufficiently deterred 80,000 troops ago.

I think if Moscow is going to escalate against Kiev it ought to at least do it like a boss and be sincere. Not hide behind see-through pretexts relating to made-up or highly exaggerated recent events. But simply explain the fundamental causes of its action and the necessity and justice of its cause as it sees it. Come out with “ya actually we don’t have a manufactured tear-jerker from 2 minutes ago to cite as an excuse, this goes much deeper than that, and we’ve been preparing for 2.5 years now.”

Comments (11)
Add Comment
  • TZVI

    Why now?

    A) Because they (Russia) are prepared.

    B) Because it has been almost 7 years, and the Minsk accords can not be fully implemented due to various Ukrainian laws passed after the international treaty. ( aka at least partial Abrogation by one side of said treaty).

    C) Because, IF their is is ANY hope of forcing Ukraine to take back the LPR and DPR peacefully it would only be with the help of pressure from the outside Ukraine.( This includes Germany and France, and the way to pressure them was to turn up the heat.)

    IF ( and that is a big “IF”) that can be accomplished it will be a big win for the Ukrainians. Autonomous regions really have no power outside of some local issues. ( Witness Scotland, Sicily, etc.). It would be a return to the status quo before 2014, minus Crimea. Implementation of the Minsk accords does not require Ukraine to give up any territorial claims in any case.

    D) Because, the OSCE is not on the contact line, having fled from a possible invasion, that leaves the door open to hostilities on both sides. That Putin could Issue recognition of the LPR and DPR at any moment, OPEN military assistance could be provided very quickly if need be.

    E) Because, all states either downplay or exaggerate certain events in order to accomplish their goals. Many do worse than that, including false flag events, etc.

    “I think if Moscow is going to escalate against Kiev it ought to at least be sincere. Not hide behind see-through pretexts relating to made-up or highly exaggerated recent events.”

    Still, they ( Russia) have been more forward about their intentions in this matter. Big demands from NATO, Big proclamations on the “Donbass”, etc. Ukraine has also been quite open in it’s hostility to Russian speakers, and their intentions to take back the LPR and DPR by force, as well as Crimea.

    Both have massed forces and equipment at the contact line, if at least one on either side wants want war, and war they shall have. That Minsk or Humanitarian issue will be a pretext is not at all shocking, it should be expected at this point in time.

  • Steve Ginn

    It would appear that this Marko Marjanović is a Ukronazi puppet and his “opinions” shouldn’t be taken seriously. The Ukrops in Kiev are insane enough to start anything in the Donbass.

    • Ultrafart the Brave

      I believe the author of this article is also the proprieter of the Anti Empire platform, the very platform here on which we have the freedom to express our views.

      IMO Mr. Marjanovic’s views on Russia sometimes seem a little tenuous. The general thrust of this article doesn’t mesh well with my understanding of the world, for example. Perhaps Mr. Marjanovic has strong personal links to Ukraine or a life history which otherwise biases his perspectives (and to be fair, we all do). Or maybe he’s seeing something that we can’t.

      Aren’t we all just a little bit cynical about the motives of our governments? I would think that’s a healthy point of view, and there’s also merit to the idea of a Devil’s Advocate.

      Anti Empire provides a platform for authors with a diversity of views, and that’s very much to be commended. We don’t have to agree with everyone to appreciate their position and come to an understanding.

      • Peter

        “Consistency is all I ask…” You cannot have the multiplicity of all of these views, and think the writer sane. I read this site for a long time. The bits and shards of the greater picture are at times revealing, and rewarding, I am thankful for them. But what is happening evidently in the world is the usual boiling down to, or crystallization of right and wrong. To focus and dwell on the impropriety “of the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune” is in this situation immature, and it evidently confuses the readers. Judging by his name, and some of his reactions to the comments, Marko may have a background that could explain some of these observations. I seem to see this even in the juxtaposition of the last article Marko wrote on the needlessness of pretext for intervention with this article.

        • Ultrafart the Brave

          You cannot have the multiplicity of all of these views, and think the writer sane… I seem to see this even in the juxtaposition of the last article Marko wrote on the needlessness of pretext for intervention with this article.

          Okay, I admit it, you’re right – he’s crazy man!

          But kudos to Marko for hosting a mostly tolerant platform for an internationally diverse community forum.

          • Peter

            I agree with you… but it does nevertheless interests me, what it may be that makes him think this way. Marko is not stupid by any means, I appreciate very much his take of the birdman´s Lukashenko heckling, and I found it to be refreshing…
            You know when things are close to us, we do have problems dealing with them. It makes us to spout ambivalent statements, I am familiar with that, as I am sure you are too. Can you imagine anybody who comes from Eastern Europe, who lived through much of the communist bullshit praying for VV? I do. But that is a result of coming to understanding of something. It takes time, sometimes more sometimes less…
            I wish to Marko all the best, and I am thankful to him.

  • ken

    Well, this is a flip. Instead of the West calling out war now it’s Russia. We sure do like our wars! Difference is Russia is probably more credible. The insane West might figure – wrongly- that they have Russia bullied. After all, the West banging the war drums was just a psyop.

    The regions, Crimea, and as I understand it, LPR, DPR never ‘belonged’ to Ukraine to begin with. Ukrainians treated them like step children so it goes without saying that Ukraine has no real claim on them.

    Russia has made so many mistakes over this situation,,, They should have re-annexed them right after Crimea,,, they should not have stopped the militias when they had the Ukrainian’s on the run,,,and the Minsk treaty was a no go from the beginning as it allowed the West time to re-arm them just enough to make them dangerous.

    Many more deaths will occur because of these mistakes but that too fits in with Schwabs/Gates/ World ‘leaders’ Bio-weapon depopulation plans.

    They don’t care how you die,,,, Just die!

    • Peter

      We readers, read and react without knowing the whole picture. It is in the makeup of the sane soul to react to injustice. People who do not have this reaction are psychopaths. What may seem as a mistake in the past, may have been simply awareness of ones weakness and inability to DO SOMETHING. Putin just said that to Scholz. Evidently that time is over…

  • Hostage (Raptar) Driver

    I believe Marco is just saying Russia should do it & stop messing around.
    I don’t think he’s being anti Russian.

  • GMC

    Looks like the game is on – Donbass has ordered all civilians to head to Russia or Crimea. Heavy shelling on Donbass while the Ukie/US media report the opposite. Since Russia will get blamed for this , they may as well go ahead and destroy the Ukie/merc Armies and take Kiev too. See how it looks tomorrow.

  • XSFRGR

    Ukraine’s action are simply a provocation designed to cause Russia to commit one way or the other. The situation for Russia is extremely simple, and has only 3 outcomes:

    1. The U$/NATO backs down in humiliation, and the world is a better, safer place….for a while.

    2. Russia backs down in humiliation, the Empire triumphs, Putin is disgraced, and evil spreads throughout the world.

    3. Russia attacks, takes Ukraine, resulting in the death of the Empire, the world recovers, and we live happily ever after.

    I turned 75 yesterday, I’ve been in infantry combat in 2 wars, and I don’t need another war at this stage of my life, but option 3 is by far the best.