All Freedom Will Be Lost When the War Is Won

1914 is bad but it's 1918 when they really get you

Recently there has been much hand-wringing over the possibility of a major military escalation in Ukraine. Many respected thinkers and analysts are warning that the unresolved conflict in Donbass could spark full-scale war—perhaps even a direct confrontation between Ukraine and the Russian Federation. Even the truly unthinkable—American and Russian soldiers blowing each other up—now seems vaguely possible. Crazier things have happened.

Your humble Moscow correspondent is not a military analyst. We visited Donetsk twice and saw many terrible things but we do not pretend to have a deep understanding of what is happening there right now.

Your correspondent at an East Ukraine kindergarten, circa April 2015

But here’s what we can say with near 100% certainty: If there is a Big War—in Ukraine or anywhere else—it means worldwide digital “health” passports will remain with us for a very, very long time. Maybe until the Sun explodes, 5-7 billion years from now.

After all, it was only 100 years ago when a “temporary” wartime identification system—designed to restrict freedom of movement, in a flagrant violation of international norms—took root around the world… and then never went away. We’re referring to your fancy “international passport,” of course—a WW1 travel pass originally intended to help governments keep a close eye on spies, refugees and other undesirables.

The League of Nations was supposed to abolish this devilish document. But then the Spanish Flu arrived on the scene and The League decided this public safety card could also be used to protect public health. (They later admitted this was not true, but too late, suckers!)

Today people pay huge sums of money for these Suspicious Person cards—they are even considered “status symbols.” Probably in 30 years gene-edited humanoids are going to be bragging on TikTok about how their implantable Sberbank microchip health ID allows them to drive their steam-powered Tesla to Mexico without a visa.

Let’s travel back in time, together, and remind ourselves how we arrived at such a sad state of affairs.

‘Before the war nobody asked you for a passport’

The modern-day passport has become such an accepted and natural part of civilized life that few even bother to ask how or why it came into existence. Did cavemen inherit this tagging system from the dinosaurs?

Throughout history travel documents have fallen in and out of fashion—but the international passport that we all know and love is practically brand-new; not that much older than the first Harry Potter book in the grand scheme of things.

At least back then you could share a passport with F. Scott Fitzgerald

The irreplaceable Stefan Zweig—who eventually killed himself because of how upset he was about passports and so many other terrible developments during his lifetime—provided the best firsthand account of the introduction of this travel document and what it represented to those who once knew a better world:

Nothing makes us more sensible of the immense relapse into which the world fell after the First World War than the restrictions on man’s freedom of movement and the diminution of his civil rights.

Before 1914 the earth had belonged to all. People went where they wished and stayed as long as they pleased.

There were no permits, no visas, and it always gives me pleasure to astonish the young by telling them that before 1914 I traveled from Europe to India and to America without passport and without ever having seen one. One embarked and alighted without questioning or being questioned, one did not have to fill out a single one of the many papers which are required today. […]

The world was on the defensive against strangers, everywhere they got short shrift. The humiliations which once had been devised with criminals alone in mind now were imposed upon the traveler, before and during every journey. […]

If I reckon up the many forms I have filled out during these years, declarations on every trip, tax declarations, foreign exchange certificates, border passes, entrance permits, departure permits, registrations on coming and on going; the many hours I have spent in ante-rooms of consulates and officials, the many inspectors, friendly and unfriendly, bored and overworked, before whom I have sat, the many examinations and interrogations at frontiers I have been through, then I feel keenly how much human dignity has been lost in this century which, in our youth, we had credulously dreamed of as one of freedom, as of the federation of the world.

The loss in creative work, in thought, as a result of those spirit-crushing procedures is incalculable. Have not many of us spent more time studying official rules and regulations than works of the intellect!

The first excursion in a foreign country was no longer to a museum or to a world renowned view, but to a consulate, to a police office, to get a “permit.”

Indeed, it’s fun to think (and quietly cry) about how the First World War—which allegedly destroyed various autocratic regimes and replaced them with freedom-loving liberal democracies—actually heralded the end of one of the most basic and fundamental human rights: the right to go somewhere without needing special permission or getting your nether-regions massaged by a diabetic TSA agent.

This phenomenon was nicely summarized by B. Traven in his very good novel, The Death Ship (1924):

It seems to me the sailor’s card, and not the sun, is the center of the universe. I am positive the great war was fought, not for democracy or justice, but for no other reason than that a cop, or an immigration officer, may have the legal right to ask you, and be well paid for asking you, to show him your sailor’s card, or what have you. Before the war nobody asked you for a passport.

And were the people happy? Wars for liberty and independence are to be suspected most of all, ever since the Prussians fought their war for liberty against Napoleon. All peoples lost their freedom when that war was won, because all liberty went to that war and has been there ever since.


The League of Failures

The League of Nations was supposed to abolish the international passport system sometime in the early-to-mid 1920s. It was literally “on the agenda.”

Then, in 1926, the governments of the world had a big announcement: “Passports are here to stay, even though we known they’re unpopular and discriminatory. Whatever, deal with it.”

At least they tried!

The only non-asshole at this passport conference was the delegate from Hungary, who kept pointing out that the passport system was dehumanizing and basically useless.

Things that didn’t happen.

Even the Italians—who played a very greasy game where they opposed passports in principle but still said they wanted them—admitted that using a piece of paper to mark someone as “healthy” made zero sense because you are always capable of getting sick.

What a novel concept.

In an article published in 1931, Italian diplomat Egidio Reale explained why everyone hated the League of Failures:

Reasonable persons hoped that with the return of peace would come a return to the former freedom from travel restrictions. But despite solemn declarations in the peace treaties, requests from international organizations and promises made by several governments, the compulsory passport system was not abolished, or even modified. It was to some extent made even stricter.

This guy had no idea how good he had it. He was allowed to travel without proof of a fourth booster shot.

Incurably optimistic

As we have proven beyond a reasonable doubt, all freedom will be lost when the next war is won. It doesn’t even matter “who” wins this future war—that’s the best part!

Your great-grandpa was hounded by irredeemable imbeciles—now it’s your turn.

The next war—which really could be anything, like a sneaky cyber-strike or a coordinated stock market crash or an electronic pulse-emitting satellite that irradiates all the McDonald’s cheeseburgers, killing zillions—will cause ordinary people to root for each other’s immediate demise. Anyone who survives will be treated like factory farm poultry.

It’s not all bad. It could even be fun, in a weird way. It just depends on your perspective.

For example, here’s British journalist Philip Gibbs marveling at how awful everything was in 1920:

For good or ill, a revolution will happen. It has happened in the sense that already there is no resemblance between this Europe after-the-war and that Europe-before-the-war, in the mental attitude of the masses toward the problems of life.

In every country there are individuals, men and women, who are going about as though what had happened had made no difference, and as though, after a period of restlessness, the people will ‘settle down’ to the old style of things. They are merely sleep-walkers.

But then here’s Henry Miller—who was always seeing the silver lining in things!—writing about post-WW1 Paris:

Walking along the Champs-Elysées I keep thinking of my really superb health. When I say ‘health’ I mean optimism, to be truthful. Incurably optimistic! Still have one foot in the nineteenth century. I’m a bit retarded, like most Americans.

Humanity hangs by a thread, friends.

Source: Edward Slavsquat

Editor’s note: Question is, is our Great War still in the future (and may thus not happen at all), or did it already happen? I think we already had our 1914 two years ago when The War on the Plague of the Apocalypse kicked off. Only in this one, it wasn’t young men who were sent to senseless deaths in their millions, but TB patients and children on the edge of malnutrition in the Third World.

When it’s “won” and our 1918 arrives, will the new reality be that the “temporary” system where going somewhere that is across a “border” requires you to, like cattle, have an injections booklet is made permanent forever and ever? It would take a brave man to say that it won’t.

  1. Sam says

    I live in the Balkans and i don’t want hordes of blacks pouring into my country in the name of ‘freedom’ without passports or anything. There’s thoudands pouring into USA now without any documentation. I agree with some things you’ve said but i believe passports do have a role.

    1. Field Empty says

      San svakog crnca: da živi na Balkanu.

      1. guest says

        obviously, a few dozens should take up residence in your back-yard

      2. Sam says

        Misliš da nije? Nude njim Belgiju itd ali oni vele jok,samo Balkan

    2. 5thPlaceWinner says

      I agree. Ask the libtards to NEVER lock their own cars, homes, or even hotel rooms. In fact, these imbeciles should also have a PROUD sign on all these properties stating: “Proudly unarmed and unlocked, welcome all poor and immigrants to my property.”

      Retards indeed.

      1. Edward Slavsquat says

        enjoy your QR code! 🙂

  2. guest says

    Stefan Zweig, the internationalist (by some strange co-incidence a hebrew).

    “because of how upset he was about passports”
    If true, he waited a long time (until 1942) to do the favour.

  3. nnn says

    Zionist mafia runs the show

  4. GMC says

    Ya well , it’s gotten a whole lot worse since 1918, and that No fly list was the most unconstitutional Law that no supreme court would overturn.

    My idea , had I been a rich rich man that actually cared about the human species, would have started up the old world class steamer transportation business that sailed to many destinations around the world. Similiar like a Titanic and White line ships of the early 20th Century, but without the iceberg route. lol After the Covid scam started , there were many opportunities to buy up the cruise ships that were standing still in dry dock. And of course Americans would have had to board them from Mexico , because the USGov would have passed drastic laws – prohibiting them from operating but – this would have worked fine for an alternate mode of transportation. Too bad.

    1. Edward Slavsquat says

      started up the old world class steamer transportation business” — haha, love it!
      hey you mentioned something earlier about QR codes being introduced in public transport in Crimea. Were you referring to Sevastopol signing off on the federal bill ( or is there something on top of that? either way, distressing — although hardly surprising. what a train-wreck…

      1. GMC says

        The Yandex article was referring to the Simferopol Peoples Congress the first time and then the Crimea Parliament took a vote and passed the resolution, in order to add Crimea to the Federal scam law. I’m not sure when the Feds will vote on it , but it’s a scam all the way. A savvy American can spot a scam – anywhere.

        Oh , I just happened to drop your name and a couple of your article on a R T comment – both were deleted – lol When R T went South they brought in Disqus to take out all the honest commenters. Anti Empire is looking like one of the last Men Standing !

        1. Edward Slavsquat says

          lol @ RT. thanks for trying, though!

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.