A Group Of Parents Sent Their Kids’ Face Masks to a Lab for Analysis. Here’s What They Found

"Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria"

We’ve been told for well over a year that widespread forced public masking should be implemented because, even if only moderately to slightly to negligibly effective at curbing the spread of COVID-19, there are ZERO drawbacks.

“What’s the harm?” they ask.

“It’s only a minor inconvenience,” they bleat.

“If it saves ONE LIFE, it’s worth it!” they implore.

Meanwhile, we on Team Reality have not only continued to point to real-world data that shows masking to be entirely ineffective, we’ve also maintained that forced public masking, especially long-term, has negative societal and even health ramifications that the powers-that-be are all-too-happy to ignore in subservience to their newfound face mask god.

It only stands to reason that one of those health ramifications would be the fact that millions of people, particularly children, have been forced to wear and carry around pieces of cloth they’ve continually breathed through for hours on end. What lurking pathogens might be found on these disgusting contraptions being incessantly handled, stuck in pockets, and mindlessly tossed on books, tables, and desks? Well, one group of Florida parents sent a batch of masks worn by their children to a lab to find out. And yeah, you’ll probably need to make sure you aren’t eating dinner anytime soon before you digest THESE results.

Via press release:

Gainesville, FL (June 16, 2021) – A group of parents in Gainesville, FL, concerned about potential harms from masks, submitted six face masks to a lab for analysis. The resulting report found that five masks were contaminated with bacteria, parasites, and fungi, including three with dangerous pathogenic and pneumonia-causing bacteria. No viruses were detected on the masks, although the test is capable of detecting viruses.

The analysis detected the following 11 alarmingly dangerous pathogens on the masks:

• Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumonia)

• Mycobacterium tuberculosis (tuberculosis)

• Neisseria meningitidis (meningitis, sepsis)

• Acanthamoeba polyphaga (keratitis and granulomatous amebic encephalitis)

• Acinetobacter baumanni (pneumonia, blood stream infections, meningitis, UTIs— resistant to antibiotics)

• Escherichia coli (food poisoning)

• Borrelia burgdorferi (causes Lyme disease)

• Corynebacterium diphtheriae (diphtheria)

• Legionella pneumophila (Legionnaires’ disease)

• Staphylococcus pyogenes serotype M3 (severe infections—high morbidity rates)

• Staphylococcus aureus (meningitis, sepsis)

Half of the masks were contaminated with one or more strains of pneumonia-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with one or more strains of meningitis-causing bacteria. One-third were contaminated with dangerous, antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens. In addition, less dangerous pathogens were identified, including pathogens that can cause fever, ulcers, acne, yeast infections, strep throat, periodontal disease, Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, and more.

The face masks studied were new or freshly-laundered before wearing and had been worn for 5 to 8 hours, most during in-person schooling by children aged 6 through 11. One was worn by an adult. A t-shirt worn by one of the children at school and unworn masks were tested as controls. No pathogens were found on the controls. Proteins found on the t-shirt, for example, are not pathogenic to humans and are commonly found in hair, skin, and soil.

A parent who participated in the study, Ms. Amanda Donoho, commented that this small sample points to a need for more research: “We need to know what we are putting on the faces of our children each day. Masks provide a warm, moist environment for bacteria to grow.”

These local parents contracted with the lab because they were concerned about the potential of contaminants on masks that their children were forced to wear all day at school, taking them on and off, setting them on various surfaces, wearing them in the bathroom, etc. This prompted them to send the masks to the University of Florida’s Mass Spectrometry Research and Education Center for analysis.

The below chart, put together by the group of parents, shows the potential dangers from each pathogen:

Appetizing, eh? Of course, nothing above, or anything else, will deter the extremists in the masking cult, some of whom now want to see masking in schools forever.

Source: Townhall

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
9 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Raptar Driver
Raptar Driver
1 month ago

Pure and simple, medical tyranny! May I add, child abuse?
The criminals need to be arrested and taken out of any influence.

Last edited 1 month ago by Raptar Driver
Eileen Kuch
Eileen Kuch
1 month ago
Reply to  Raptar Driver

Raptar Driver, you’re absolutely right, and I totally agree. Pure and simple, it’s both medical tyranny and child abuse.
The criminals responsible for this child abuse need to be arrested, charged with child abuse, and prosecuted .. And, if convicted, be immediately sent to GITMO for life.

ken
ken
1 month ago

The average ‘adult parent’ should be educated enough to KNOW,,,

A: The masks will not even slow down a virus.
B: The warm moist mask will collect all sorts of pathogens.
C: The mask will limit the oxygen and increase CO2. Bad, especially for children.

Therefore this ‘adult parent’ should never have placed a mask on a child (or themselves) for over 1 hour. They risked the health of these children just doing the test!

No need for a PhD,,, no need for a MD,,, no need for an expert…. Just plain old common sense that ain’t so common these days.

Andra
Andra
1 month ago
Reply to  ken

“Should be…”. One would surmise that same idea would apply when facing
the experimental, widely noxious in the body, often deadly injections.
But…given the numbers of takers…no such luck.

Mark
1 month ago
Reply to  ken

Our own Saint Bonnie (Dr. Bonnie Henry, Public Health Officer for the province of British Columbia) very clearly said in a public forum that ‘nobody’ advises the wearing of masks for 8 hours a day, but I wear a mask more than 8 hours a day because my employer mandates mask-wearing as a preventative measure against the transmission of coronavirus. I have had a more or less nonstop head cold for nearly 8 months because I breathe my own germs all day. Mask guidance established through research reports their filtration capacity drops off sharply (from a level that was completely inadequate to filter out a virus to begin with) as soon as the mask becomes moist from your breath, which typically occurs in 20 to 30 minutes. Who changes their mask every 30 minutes? Anyone? Anyone? Beuler?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RU9JACTmIro

adrian
adrian
1 month ago

would it not stand to reason that the masks stopped the children from breathing in the pathogens?
Did any of these children contract the disease caused by the pathogens?
Where these pathogens on the inside of the masks and were exhaled by the children?
BTW I am not a fan of masks but something is to right with this story.

Hoyeru
Hoyeru
1 month ago

having lived in the 3rd world and near gypsies, I can report from first person knowledge that the Gypsies have the strongest immune systems around, literally living among garbage. It’s a well esctablished fact by now the kids playing in the dirt have a strong immune system, suffering from fewer allergies.
Therewfore, kids encountering the viruses and bacteria mentioned that were found on the masks as in fact a GOOD and a POSITIVE thing, because it introdueced their imune system to the above mentioned virii and bacteria.
But hey, you wanna reinvent reality by calling good bad and while back,, thats YOUR choice. I cant stop you, neither I wil try to. I will just present a few facts. But in today’sworld, facts as we know ery well dont matter. Its all about emotions.

Raptar Driver
Raptar Driver
1 month ago
Reply to  Hoyeru

This sounds like crazy shit from an insane person.
But actually it is completely accurate.

Nicholas Santus
Nicholas Santus
1 month ago
Reply to  Hoyeru

yep but still can effect those around them it’s a catch 21 as they say

Anti-Empire